Another Movie Production Coming To Town

Fairhope, Alabama






CALLED "MAP OF TINY PERFECT THINGS"

Brandon Goertz, location manager for executive producer (Fairhope native) Scott Lumpkin  has approached the city council about filming another major motion picture beginning in mid February and lasting into March.

Filming is to be all around town, in Daphne and Mobile too, but the central business district is to be prominently featured in the film.

Goertz second from left
The screenplay is based on a short story by Lev Grossman appearing in the the book Summer Days and Nights is "about two teens who live the day repeatedly, enabling them to create a titular map. The character Mark takes advantage of reliving the same day over and over by reading his way through a library. When he meets Margaret, who's also aware of the time loop, they set out to find every amazing event -- no matter how big or small-- that occurred that day" according to an online synopsis.

Ian Samuels is set to direct the film for Weed Road Pictures, according to various online reports.

15 cast members (actors not announced yet) and 75 crew members are expected; about 45 extras will be needed as well.


MULTIPLE STREET CLOSURES PROPOSED

Filming is tentatively set to begin on February 15 and last until March 8th. Various downtown streets (all subject to change) would have to be periodically closed during that period including Fairhope Avenue, Section Street, De La Mare, Bancroft, et al.

The interior of the library, Fairhope Pharmacy, Vernon's Barber shop, Book Inn, Coastal Community College,  Fairhope High School, house in the Fruit n' Nut neighborhood, and other locations may be used as well.

A Fred Astaire-like walk/dance sequence is slated for Section Street from the pharmacy to the Dr. Music store, according to Goertz.

Other streets will have to be used for equipment staging.


COUNCIL'S APPROVAL STILL NEEDED

The city council will have to approve the proposed street closures per city filming regulations; being during Mardis Gras season is a concern.

Based on short story.
Council members asked that businesses affected be contacted to get their oks before signing off, possibly during the next council meeting.

Mayor Wilson added later she thought some of the street closure requests were excessive and may be scaled back somewhat by producers later.

Goertz said any inconvenience to business owners may be offset by free advertising they would receive when the film is released (Amazon Prime) since the fictional town in the movie is to be called Fairhope (Massachusetts?); other compensation could be provided in some cases too, he added.

Part of the city's Pecan Avenue warehouse if to be leased for two months for equipment storage as well.


STANDARD FILMING FEES CHARGED BY CITY












Comments

LA Stands for Lower Alabama, Please said…
Locals and localities are rarely well-used by movie production companies. Ask anyone (e.g. in small California towns) who's been through it--promised the moon, but given the shaft.

Elected officials get google-eyed by the flattery, maybe a chance to meet a star, and the community suffers a net financial loss and tremendous inconvenience.

Fairhope needs nothing from Hollywood--not even 15 minutes of fame for local extras. Keep the wolves outside the fence.
Anonymous said…
This could be problematic during Mardi Gras, given the lack of parking for shoppers and parade attendees. However, this worst part is that the street closures are apparently for pedestrian traffic as well as vehicles. On pretty much any day, there are numerous residents and tourists out walking around town. This will not end well! If I were on City Council, I would tell the production company to delay filming until after Mardi Gras. If they had the nerve to wait until this week to request this (given that they planned to begin in 30 days), they should surely not be surprised. Perhaps they have already been turned down by other cities?
HM said…
Is the production company being required to pony up $$$ like New Orleans does for the many movies set there? Such funds cover extra law enforcement, loss of business and related costs.
Publisher said…
Yes. A $1,000 filming fee with a $5K deposit. Also $30 per hour cost for extra police, public works, etc.
Anonymous said…
Is that per hour? From what I have heard, the location scout stated that the intersection of Fairhope and Section could be closed to both pedestrian and motor traffic for many hours for several days. Nothing has been clarified yet, but we are already dealing with so many street closures with no end in sight. Mardi Gras will bring many more drivers and pedestrians and the filming company will bring much more traffic (along with make-up/costume trailers/craft services, etc), all of which will further restrict parking for everyone. Sad that the production company waited until two days ago to request to do this. Burrell needs to tell them that we would love to host them, but not during that time schedule. I read that the producer is Scott Lumpkin; he has lived here long enough to know that this will be unworkable; I am saddened by the fact that he took it so for granted that he didn't even bother to ask.
Publisher said…
The current street closures, for new crosswalks and sewer lines, should be over by then. Representatives for the production company are supposed to contact all affected downtown business owners about their plans well beforehand.
ron meszaros said…
If I remember clearly, the film "A Friend" a story about Matt Teague and his sweet wife Nicole, came and went in Fairhope last year about this same time frame with a scant a bump in any one's life. Todays filming with Digital Cameras does not require the big lights and generators and six film trucks as it has in the past. If we tolerate Mardi Gras parades and parties and a few inebriated fellow citizens shouting at all hours in the night, then we can tolerate closing down a street for a few hours. Lets not forget at the end of this film, our town's name will be listed in the credits and for the next ten years visitors will want to visit here and add to their money to our economy. We certainly could use the money to fix our substructure.
Anonymous said…
The last time a movie was filmed here, they blocked the front entrance to my store for 1 1/2 days. They were rude and arrogant. I received no compensation. That will not happen to me again.
Anonymous said…
Well as for compensation to a business forced to close during filming is a fallacy.Most production companies will offer free credit and advertising,well that all BS. The rate of law enforcement is misquoted as the going rate is $55.per hour as charged to Bala Productions five years ago to provide security at Dorgans Inn.Has it been reduced to accommodate the production company?During filming in Daphne not long ago several businesses were promised and contracted to loss of revenue and ended up losing hundreds of dollars in applied revenue after the fact.During all of the construction currently underway with in the city the added production venue is a clear and burdensome event.Even after several filming in last two to three years several have had to hire lawyers to finally get paid for their so called contracted services.I personally have worked in the industry and it's false promised will NOT be answered or completed.It is the way of a production company.There are several still NOT paid today from previous productions.If you have a business and or property,and are approached by a production company,their only concern is their own interests not yours.
Say Goodbye to Hollyweird said…
I did not even consider that "Fairhope" will be listed in the credits at the end of the film (to be released on Amazon, not theaters). Just as the gaffer, key grip, and best boy will be launched into stratospheric celebrity because of every movie watcher's careful study of the credits, so will our town. Our sales tax revenue will likely double--at least--with in a year. Then again, maybe that's a ridiculous thing to believe.

Boy, though, they must have lots of those unobtrusive "digital cameras" if, as the newspaper reports: "other streets will have to be used for equipment staging." On the other hand, perhaps you are misrepresenting the reality of what this will do to our community, Ron. Film companies use small towns roughly and poorly. Too often, small town residents confuse movie studio attention for respect, condescension for flattery.

One last thing...we do not "tolerate" Mardis Gras. It is not imposed upon us. It's our party, our tradition. One is free to dislike it and any excess associated therewith, but let's not also misrepresent our parades to create a false equivalence with a Hollywood takeover. Yes, Hollywood, that's where Lumpkin's production company is located; so, let's not overstate Tennessee-born Lumpkin's Fairhope connection to bootstrap this imposition upon our way of life--in all of its manifold forms.
Anonymous said…
What’s funny here is that you have no clue what you’re talking about. I’d love to know the specific details about the small towns in California that you speak of. I think what really happened is that you were visiting a coffee shop in Northern California 20 years ago and some disgruntled town person told you an embellished story which you turned into a novel speaking for all people in little towns in California.

And as far as Hollywood coming to town, what you fail to realize is that a high percentage, in fact vast majority of the crew lives locally in our town, also adjacent towns and the people that run the shows are locals as well which provides jobs and increased taxes for people who live there. In regards to the politicians you speak so highly of, that’s not at all why they approve these, it’s a tremendous cash influx to the city, hotels, thousands and thousands of dollars of food is purchased in local stores, restaurants and shop business increases and also not to mention the excitement and publicity that it brings to our town.

I would suggest you pack your bags and move back to California where you can sit around coffee shops and gossip about people who actually work for a living
Anonymous said…
I work for a company that was contracted to refinish the flooring in a house that was used in filming 'The Friend'. The hardwood had apparently been damaged during the process.
The movie's location manager contacted us with the request and paid us promptly upon receiving our bill. I know that some production companies aren't as reliable but they can't all be colored with the same brush.
Ricky Gervais Is Right said…
Glad the movie producers are here blog and call us clueless, dishonest, and naive. Good storytelling, too; that's your business after all.

This nicely reveals their attitude toward us--we, the provincial rubes for whom our betters know what's best.

"Thousands and thousands dollars" is always the fairytale told, but the evil witch wins in this one.

Finally, if you'd like to know specifics of the small towns exploited in Souther California, drive through the sticks of Ventura County and ask some the regular folks, you know, the ones so far beneath you.

Glad to know that you "work of a living," though. Those of us who care about the quality of life in Fairhope live off of welfare programs funded by the millions collected from movie companies. We are in humbly in your debt.

Publisher said…
Repetitive tit-for-tat comments may not be published.
Anonymous said…
I hope that this is not considered 'tit for tat', but I agree whole heartedly that we 'do NOT tolerate Mardi Gras'; Mardi Gras belongs to the heart of Fairhope. I believe that we love for production companies (particularly Scott Lumpkin) to bring their films here. However, we cannot shut down our lives to enrich yours; figure out a shooting schedule in which our downtown can continue to thrive and serve both our residents and our revered visitors. (Perhaps the Section Street/Fairhope Ave dance scene should be shot on an early Sunday morning rather than a Friday or Saturday afternoon, etc)!
Anonymous said…
I AM a "Local" and I've worked as a full-time employee on every movie filmed in Mobile and Baldwin County in the past decade. Most of the Production Crew are "Locals" just like me. YES, we do the same jobs on movies as our counterparts in LA, New Orleans, Atlanta, and throughout the world. Our kids go to school here, we shop in the same stores, and spend our paychecks here...though some of those paychecks come from movies and commercials we work on in other states. It comes home with us to be spent, along with money spent by the production company on equipment rentals, car and van rentals, catering, lodging, travel, office space and all kinds of things it takes to make a movie on location. Trust me when I tell you NOTHING is free for a production company. They pay, pay, pay. No discounts. If anything, they pay higher prices because they need it NOW, and the long-suffering good citizens of the towns and cities we shoot in never miss an opportunity to make a killing off of us while they can. So before you moan and whine about all the "Movie People" "Taking over your street"...let me be clear: It's OUR street, too, because MOST of us doing the actual work on the movie are your fellow Mobile and Baldwin County residents...out here making an honest living.
Anonymous said…
Bravo! MOST crew members are LOCALS...We spend our paychecks, pay our taxes, and VOTE here.

Gotta love the internet...where a pompous ass can spout-off about things they know nothing about. Until someone exposes their lack of knowledge, that is.
Anonymous said…
Cardiology Associates is going to get some business from this blog, now does that make me stupid or pompous or both?
Eric Arthur Blair said…
One side seeks to make money by excluding others from enjoying freedom of movement and by restricting commerce. In doing so, it claims: 1) that it actually is making money ("a killing," they say) for those others--a wondrous gift from above that cannot rationally be forsaken; 2) that it has rights to our public spaces equal to those others, but that THEIR equal rights further include the right to exclude those others for profit (evidently, some people are more equal than others); and, finally, that anyone with a different opinion is ignorant or a "pompous ass" or should move to California.

The other side wishes to live in Fairhope as it is--not nearly perfect, but beautiful, free, and thriving.

In deciding which side's motives and words I trust, I will take my cue from C.S. Lewis...

"[T]hose who torment us for our own good will torment us without end for they do so with the approval of their own conscience."

Anonymous said…
I have rented my home in the past to 2 members of a production crew that were flown in from California. Every request I made of them was agreed on & the paid to have my home cleaned by my preferred agency. It was requested to be done weekly & then upon their departure. The shopped local businesses & they left several gifts for me that were used during filming that they asked permission to leave. I have nothing but good things to say about them
Anonymous said…
I have seen production companies many times over the years and generally feel they behave well and do a reasonable job. Some people benefit more than others but on balance I think the deal is positive whether or not the city gets name recognition.. there do seem to be a lot of people who don’t want new arrivals, visitors , or strangers around town. I hope we can be more inviting than that.
Focus said…
They say that Pol Pot was beloved by his former students. Which is not to draw a preposterous equivalency between movie producers and genocidal maniacs, but rather to illustrate the limited value of anecdotes.

I'm happy to learn that, once upon a time, two nice Californians cleaned up after themselves in a private home and gave that homeowner gifts.

This, however, is not a basis for sound public policy.