Fairhope Police Say No Crime Wave in Montrose

ONLY NINE BURGLARIES REPORTED THIS YEAR

Assistant Fairhope Police Chief Sanders, Investigators King, Nolte and other officers told a large group of Montrose-area residents (about 1/3 who live in the city limits according to informed sources) there have been only nine "break ins" reported there this year, but one resident, Kent Hendricks, has been hit 5 times. (Officer King reported that in 2009 over 60 such electronics thefts occurred in the Scenic Pt. Clear neighborhood.)

Hendricks (who reportedly does live in the city limits) had been burglarized again over the Memorial Day weekend (flat screened TV) -- and had distributed video of the crime to the media. He said 2 unarmed men in a white SUV had been involved: one had a visible tattoo; and he fired into the air to scare them off.

Hendricks had complained the investigation was proceeding too slowly--since he gave officers the video tape early last Friday morning. Investigator King said he was" handed the file Tuesday." Officer King said he had a suspect in mind that has yet to be located--but declined to further comment on the active investigation.



UNLOCKED DOORS/CARS A PROBLEM

When asked what citizens should be doing, the officers said keeping  doors/windows locked  would significantly reduce thefts. Recording serial numbers of valuables, "getting a dog" or security cameras/lights, reporting suspicious vehicles, etc.  -- were also encouraged.

LACK OF MANPOWER/ LARGE JURISDICTION A FACTOR

In response to a question raised by a citizen, the officers said the four men (per shift) assigned to cover the whole police jurisdiction (88 square miles) were at times overwhelmed by the volume of calls/false alarms; and it was hoped more officers could be hired next year (up to 7/shift). As an example,  Daphne has 12 officers on duty per shift they said. Reducing the size of the police jurisdiction has also been discussed previously.

It was surprising to some that there is currently no penalty imposed for the 100-200 false home burglar alarm calls police have to answer every month; but Chief Sanders said that is currently being considered (fines).

The Fairhope Police Department responds to about 600-800 total calls per month they said; this data is available at the Police Advisory Committee meetings held second Tuesdays each month at the Nix Center.

NEW RESOURCES COMING

Thanks to a new CAD computer system purchased last year by the city council, the officers said a crime tip-line and e-mailed alerts to citizens will soon be implemented. The officers said there was a Montrose Community Watch program at one time and they could help re-institute it if the community so desired.

USE OF DEADLY FORCE DISCOURAGED

Chief Sanders said residents are allowed by current Alabama law to defend themselves as necessary only if their lives are in jeopardy, but the law doesn't allow them to  "shoot thieves in the back . . .  carrying off their tvs." See Alabama Code 13A 3 23.

Comments

Anonymous said…
if people want fairhope police protection they should stop whining and annex into the city and pay full taxes like everybody else.
Anonymous said…
it would help if people would lock their doors, both to their houses and their vehicles. also if you have an alarm system, turn it on. at the meeting I found out that Mr Hendricks did not have his alarm turned on and the doors were unlocked.
Anonymous said…
all of the big new chain stores and hotels change a town, bring in more crime too. there is no turning back the clock to the good old days ten or 15 years ago.
Anonymous said…
Agree with annexation and paying for police protecton. Then again, why should they. As long there are the money hot spots like Point Clear and Montrose,it means a lot of campaign contributions...these people in montrose should hire their own security firm, then again, it's like the school system, why pay for it when you can get someone else to?
Anonymous said…
Why not just pull police protection back to the city linits and let the sheriff handle outside in the county?not our problem. a no brainer.
Anonymous said…
I agree...let's put a bubble around our city and not let anyone in without proper ID or help protect citizens beyond the city's borders. Those Montrose residents are just too far away from the city limits. Sorry, you're just going to have to tough it out.
Anonymous said…
they can annex in and pay full taxes rather than freeloading off the rest of us.
Anonymous said…
"Officer King reported that in 2009 over 60 such electronics thefts occurred in the Scenic Pt. Clear neighborhood."

Montrose is not in Point Clear.
Anonymous said…
They should annex in and quit free loading.....
Anonymous said…
I think I am going to move to Montrose since, according to all of you, they don't pay ANY taxes. Awesome!!!!

Montrose, here I come...
Anonymous said…
Those folks in Montrose who live outside the city limits pay no property tax to the city: only to state and county.

Those who live inside the city limits pay city property taxes, I believe its currently 2.5 mils.

Currently, everybody there gets the same police and fire protection.

Its true those outside do help pay a city sales tax (only since 2008 though) and some are utility customers as well.
Anonymous said…
Do any of you know if this gentleman has annexed into the city? Seems like a lot of experts here with very little facts.
Anonymous said…
None of those people lock their doors. what do they expect?