Drought Emergency May Be Declared

Fairhope, Alabama

Update: The city council did adopt a water conservation ordinance effective May 27th. Currently, residents are only being asked to conserve water.





EMERGENCY COUNCIL MEETING TOMORROW 

The city's water system is nearing 100% capacity during the current dry spell according to mayor Wilson; the situation is complicated by frequent pipeline failures due to poor workmanship by contractors she said.

A special city council meeting has been called for tomorrow (Wednesday, 4PM) to discus implementing emergency water conservation measures.

Wilson cites a need for added oversight of development projects as well (vs. "self-inspection"):


 "The drought increases use of irrigation which decreases capacity. The pressure causes cracks and leaks. The problem is compounded due to lack of City oversight. We continue to allow developers to "self-inspect" engineering work with the engineer they hire. As a result, substandard materials are used for waterlines (and more) in addition to being installed improperly. This is why I have emphasized the need for an engineering Dept to inspect on behalf of the city and citizens buying the property. We spend far more money fixing problems as a result of not having this oversight. I will continue to push for this and hope people run for council who understand the cost of the City's liability when we continue to allow developers to cut corners."


Comments

Wise Guy. said…
Great. First an epidemic. Now a water shortage.
What next. Hurricanes?
Anonymous said…
Have been adding many a note about over-development. And then the rebutal its my land can do what I want. Well now you see how the the major utility services need to be in place first. Not after. Hey wise guy summer on the way next will be the electrical grid. Imagine that, no A/C. Mayor is correct on this and time to think health and saftey.
Anonymous said…
"Wise Guy. said...
Great. First an epidemic. Now a water shortage.
What next. Hurricanes?"

What next?

More sophomoric drivel from Wise Guy.
Anonymous said…
Sunny, blue sky, just an all-around beautiful day today, too bad some are so miserable with themselves and everything they won’t enjoy.
Happy Guy
Anonymous said…
For years, many of us having been on our soap boxes trying to get people this understand that unbridled growth is unsustainable and would eventually outpace our city services.
For 10 years, our schools, which are some of the best in the State, have been overwhelmed, with kinds in portable classrooms.
Our outdated infrastructure has turned Hwy 98 into a hell like Airport Blvd.
Simple services, like debris collection, aren't happening on a regular basis because the City's capacity is stretched too thin.
When are we going to wake up and start charging developers a higher impact fee and start enforcing annual growth limits that we already have in place?
Anonymous said…
I agree with the statement of poor quality and workmanship to contractors and subcontractors.However several factors play into this situation.One specialty contractors are exempt from state bid laws as a specialty contractor(ie plumbing,electrical etc)two,the lack of actual code enforcement and the lack of over-site to back charge the contractor for the failure,three,during the installation of the AT&T system the city engineer for the couldn't even read the prints supplied to him.How do I know?During an installation of a underground service box the contractor was cutting 6-8 inch roots from the city oak tree in the front yard.I asked as to why(the answer was not in English)as the engineer arrived,he couldn't ascertain the actual location he was at so I asked to see the prints and had to show him.Four When city employees say it's not my job,call the city,get arrested for stalking the job sites as an inspector to steal the equipment.Which included two other participants(NOT INVESTIGATED BY FPD),it establishes a capability of failure.Governmental,financially.The FPD failed to continue the investigation as there are several witnesses that have information to give but was TOTALLY DISCOUNTED,and never followed through.SO there are failures and successes everywhere.Yet the city can buy a corner for a donated clock that now has an EPA cleanup cost that FAR exceeded the cost of the purchase.Fees added to our water bill ($4 per meter inside and out side city limits)to pay for these up grades.A school building sitting empty and now needs a roof and a study to find out why and how to roof it.So NOTHING is surprising any more.As we enter the next phase of this pandemic the public ALWAYS PAYS THE PRICE.
Anonymous said…
When are those on their soap boxes trying to get people to understand that they don't understand going to understand or realize we do understand but you miss-understand our difference of opinion as us not understanding?
Anonymous said…
The above Anonymous comments are exactly right! Developers, Contractors, and Sub-Contractors have been getting away with what are almost illegal acts! Poor quality materials and labor for almost every project the City has undertaken, and these people are never required to
share any costs to repair their shoddy work. Can’t the City get contracts that will hold the developers responsible for some of these things instead of throwing all the repairs on the backs of taxpayers? And don’t we have Building Inspectors that are supposed to catch these cost-cutting shortcuts before they’re finished? It’s time to put a halt to new construction until the infrastructure problems can be fixed. The Mayor and City Council all ran on a promise of controlling growth, and are failing miserably at it.
Anonymous said…
Mayor Wilson said, "the situation is complicated by frequent pipeline failures due to poor workmanship by contractors"

As an engineer of a large utility, poor contractor workmanship should have never happened. Proper oversight of all contracted construction projects should necessitate a city inspector to verify that all work is in compliance to plans and specifications. To do so otherwise, then caveat emptor and waste of taxpayers money.
Anonymous said…
It took me awhile to see through the engineers who head our city utilities and building inspections. They have a confident air about themselves and know enough to talk over most resident’s heads. I feel they are not nearly so knowledgeable.as most of us think. They will play the game a few years and move on down the road when things begin to go south. Part of it might be they are not working such brutal hours as they want you to think they are. If they were top flight they would most likely be making much more money in the private sector.

I have been against having a city manager but it would be great to find someone really good to run the city. The Mayor parrots what they tell her and is not supervising. Granted, she is not earning full time pay so maybe she can improve if she gets the pay raise or maybe her successor can do better I am now in favor of hiring a city manager though .
Anonymous said…
The commenters on here probably don't even know what end of a nail to place against the wood.
Anonymous said…
Do you people or person have any idea how many dozens of inspectors it would take to do what you’re suggesting, no you don’t. Eric and his very small team do an incredible job against a massive workload.
The only workable solution is a mechanism to hold them financially accountable for problems that occur down the road.
But go ahead and keep saying derogatory things about good people, stay anonymous; I don’t want to know you!
Anonymous said…
Imagine the type of employee some of the commenters on here were and how their boss would cringe when they came into their office.
Anonymous said…
Will the city continue to grow, plant and maintain the flower beds??
Who will enforce the newly planted grass 30 day rule??



Anonymous said…
I have been on the other side. The dark side according to many. It does not take hours and hours to figure out if something is built properly and to code. These are not nuclear power plants. Also, good luck collecting on what you feel is “ shoddy” work. The builders who are substantial will price the risk into their bids if they bid at all. The best defense is a good inspection. My experience is that (government employee) inspectors are not going to bust it. I can’t judge this group because I just don’t know the volume they deal with. So I don’t have an absolute answer except that things are not as simple as everyone seems to think.
Anonymous said…
Retired after being a traveling inspector, worked many a city in the Southeast, even spent some time inspecting inspectors, you’re wrong.
Anonymous said…
There’s a reason so many service trucks have licensed and Bonded on them.
Bonding ones work works!
Anonymous said…
At my prior occupation, we had several inspectors that covered many concurrent jobs. Was it difficult for them, no it wasn't. it did require some traveling time and they needed to budget their time accordingly. Simply the large jobs require additional inspection time especially if it is considered to be a critical operation such as working near utilities, or damage of utilities, or an operation that if failed would be detrimental to operations, increase costs, and large impact to the public. Small jobs don't require full time inspectors, but large ones do. Failure to do so can be costly for the town and it's constituents, like this catastrophic failure.
Anonymous said…
Give Eric 20 inspectors instead of 2 and yes it will work your way.
Like you said, you had several inspectors.
Anonymous said…
Well 20 inspectors would get the job done. We could just pull a few more bills off our money tree.and pay them. I guess we need more inspectors to inspect all the megastructures they are building around town.
Anonymous said…
So here we go again, instead of addressing the problem we continue to disparage people (the inspectors in Fairhope are not the problem) which is why I started commenting on this topic to begin with.
But go ahead be sarcastic it really is a solution.
Anonymous said…
Built new home at another local, each part of home had to be inspected to local rules. Final inspection had to be completed prior to occupancy permit. This was on the city timetable not the developers. And some minor problems were found and corrected. And re-inspected ON THE CITY TIMETABLE.
Anonymous said…
That’s what the complainers on here do; don’t know enough to validate their position so they attack your character.
Anonymous said…
I have backed out of two new homes under contract local the past year due to bad construction. Have neighbor in same complex backed out of new home under construction due to bad construction. All three homes passed inspection, all three back-outs were un-contested by contractor. Have pictures that would stun present homeowners and win any litigation. If you don’t hire your own inspector for spot checks during construction, you’re a fool. Read the warranty’s, on a lot of these houses they’ll all make a 5-1 time period than its all yours.

Anonymous said…
To add, have neighbor who’s an architect, they challenged the builder on rafter span sizing after plans were approved and construction well under way. City inspector met with them, and yes the beams were undersized per code. It’s been corrected but who’s at fault, designer, contractor, city for approving original plans? I know the answer but the message is it was the future home owner that ultimately made sure things were built to code.
Anonymous said…
I don't believe anybody is attacking a person's character, but stating that proper oversight would eliminate many contractor induced problems.
Anonymous said…
Totally agree with comments on over development. Way too many poorly developed and built homes. Keep jamming them in. A water shortage, duh, what did you think was going to happen? Whole infrastructure is behind and will continue to get much worse.....sewage, roads, schools, garbage, etc. This stuff is not rocket science.