Candidate Calls For New Building Moratorium

Fairhope, Alabama


CC from lower left: Wilson, Sullivan, Sanders, Manelos.


Current Comprehensive Growth Plan (click)


CITY LOSING ITS CHARM?

During a virtual debate Tuesday of Fairhope mayoral candidates hosted by the Chamber of Commerce, candidate for mayor Annette Sanders thought it "doubtful"  the city will be able to maintain environmental standards under current conditions, and called for a moratorium on new construction to allow time to create a new comprehensive growth plan that works.

Sanders: "We have talked about this for 20 years ...  fast growth is usually not smart growth." She cited frequent sewage spills and storm water drainage problems, such as the crumbling bluff in her N. Mobile Street neighborhood, as examples of planning failures.

Sanders: "Nothing but fast growth the past four years ... putting a lot of dollars in developers' pockets ... but killing the bay ... destroying the bluff."


****
Candidate John Manelos said he attends a lot of city meetings and the comprehensive growth plan is rarely mentioned.

Manelos: "If there is one ... a 'Village Plan' ... it must be gathering dust on a shelf somewhere."

"Plans are fine but there has to be enforcement behind it; the mayor and council have to come up with requisite ordinances/regulations ... that reflect the will of the citizens."

He cited frequent building variances such as for higher building height, destruction of old cottages for bigger modern houses, and cutting down of 300 year old oak trees: "Losing charm happens piece-by-piece, incrementally, slowly over time."


****
Candidate Sherry Sullivan called Fairhope "a victim of its own success" by being frequently cited nationally as one of the best places to raise families or retire.

Sullivan: "We can't stop growth; but we can mange it."

"Infrastructure has to keep up to support it ... without compromising the environment or Mobile Bay," she said.

Sullivan: "It is up to city leaders ... working together ... with citizens and city staff ... to continue to evaluate and adjust the comprehensive plan ... to ensure it's working ... for today and tomorrow."

"Without effective communication and consensus among city leaders ... there can be no planning ... have to work together to implement it."


****
Mayor Wilson also emphasized the need for city utilities to keep up with growth, which was not the case when she took office, she said.

Wilson: "Responsible growth ... is tied to comprehensive land use planning; we do not have that in place now."

She said BP RESTORE grant federal funds she applied for in 2017 were just awarded in May.

The new growth plan is to be a citizen-adopted vision, a process to begin this fall and take about two years: "We'll bring in professional designers, planners, place-makers ... to show us how to grow in every area ... and still keep the sense of community."

Wilson said zoning and regulatory requirements have already been updated; standards that were not being enforced uniformly before (ie. sewage system requirements).

Wilson said the development process was completely reformed early in her administration to be more transparent and fair: "We meet with developers early now ... before design fees spent ... so they know exactly what is expected."

The process needs to continue to be manged under the same person who saw the critical need, she said.













Comments

Anonymous said…
Cant stop growth says Sherry Sullivan. Look to California-NewYork- Oregon. Residents are fleeing in record numbers. Why? Because they value there quality of life.
Anonymous said…
Wilson is psychologically unfit and Sullivan just another Kant in disguise. :(
Anonymous said…
Who is Sanders and what are qualifications?
Anonymous said…
John Manelos is by far the best of the bunch. Sherry Sullivan is Kant in a skirt, Karen is hostile to everyone and the other lady learned nothing from the mistakes that Karen has made. John Manelos is smart and we are lucky to have him in the running.
Anonymous said…
It is obvious Manelas knows nothing about Fairhope.
Anonymous said…
Things that make you go hmmmm....If Manelos truly wants to bring civility and respectful discourse back to the council-mayor relationship he should have run for Jack's seat.
Anonymous said…
By the time there is a comprehensive plan to proceed with there will not be any green space left. As a person that was born and raised in Fairhope it is very sad to see our wonderful place to live and raise a family to disappear
Anonymous said…
A "theme" among the Mayoral candidates is to get along with the city council, but the only way that could happen is to dump Burrell no matter who becomes the next Mayor !!
Anonymous said…
Burrell knows a great deal but his raging alcoholic ways don’t mix well with Fairhope’s version of Karen. The growth problem is part council and part the unelected bureaucrats at planning and zoning. They approve too much and the council is afraid of being sued by the developers.
We need a team effort. The city also needs to be more aggressive with the activities outside the city limits. Is the city able to refuse water/sewer service to properties outside the city limits ?
Anonymous said…
John has been on multiple committees and has done nothing to help theae past few years.
Anonymous said…
ha ha . funny!
Kevin T. Hardesty said…
If you are going to label someone a "raging alcoholic" or cast any other such aspersion, have the integrity not to do so anonymously. If you don't attach your name, you lack credibility, and we have every reason to dismiss you.
Anonymous said…
One person made it his life work to compromise, thank goodness the founding fathers did not. The other says the employees of Fairhope are the backbone that made the city. Nothing about the taxpayer who pays for the work. Bulds there home and family. The council has been a total failure as well as the county to limit growth. The state lawsuit is evidence to the complaint. And to add to a prior question if the ultilities are not of proper size for use .Should be no new hookups? Water and electric are not a funny matter. Karen has had to deal with abrasive council, develop a plan to eliminate debt, grow the essential service and battle the developers and go along wink-wink council. Good job Mayor.
Publisher said…
We realize it is election season but try not to get carried away or comments will have to be closed.
Anonymous said…
I made the comment calling someone an alcoholic. I was repeating inferences I had heard. I have never seen Mr Burrell drunk so I will take back what I posted. He does seem to have a volatile personality but he doesn’t deserve to labeled without any evidence and I apologize for the comment and will try to comment based on what I observe personally and not what I hear. I do believe that neither the mayor nor any of the council have done anything underhanded financially.
Publisher said…
All of the candidates we know personally are high quality people who want the best for the city, as far as we know.
Kevin T. Hardesty said…
" he doesn’t deserve to labeled without any evidence and I apologize"

You are a humble and classy poster, increasingly rare in our viscously polarized discourse today.

I'm hardly infallible, and I've got my own regrets for things I've said...

Hats off to you--a model of all of us here.
Anonymous said…
Articles I've read indicated that Mayoral Candidate John Manelos was the Vice President of a 40,000 person Fortune 100 organization (BP), which suggested to me that he was the number two person in charge of a very large company and had a great deal of business experience. However, I've also heard that Mr. Manelos was either a regional or territorial vice president of security for BP personnel. So, can someone please shed light on Mr. Manelos exact job title and duties? I would like to know exactly how many people Mr. Manelos directly managed and if Mr. Manelos actually was involved in making major business related decisions for BP or was just involved with security? Need clarification. Thanks....
Anonymous said…
One canidate owned and operated a failed buisness but thinks he can run the city? The other ran a rec department and is now qualified to run the city. I hear she is very nice though? While the present Mayor has eliminated the city debt and we now have a surplus. And a new Bayfront on trac to be built.
Anonymous said…
Employees used to call Sherry the Vice Mayor! :)
Anonymous said…
Current mayor is way to liberal may be psychologically unfit too. Imagine leading a BLM parade here!
Anonymous said…
Anyone but another Good Ole Boy, only this one's in a skirt.
Anonymous said…
Agree, Sullivan is not the answer...another Kent. Burrell NEEDS TO GO...just plain no good for Fairhope. And yes I have spoke with both of them on more than one occasion about grants for Fairhope. They never followed through. Nice folks to talk to but just don't have what it takes.

As for Manelos. He did security for BP. He was not the VP of BP, huge difference. His job would have been to help cover for BP, understand? Did any of you live here during the BP oil spill? Now he's all about the environment and knows how to run a governmental entity?? Please, based on what? Working at a company that literally is destroying the planet.

Karen is not perfect but she has tried and been successful in some areas as others have pointed out...debt gone, transparency, admits our sewer systems have been neglected and she has done something about it, etc. I think she needs another term but the real change needs to come with the Council. That's where change is really needed.
Anonymous said…
Wilson will go down as the worst mayor in Fairhope history.
Facts Matter said…
"Wilson will go down as the worst mayor in Fairhope history."

Your argument is thorough, compelling and must be believed. Thanks for the insight.