ESMPO Votes To Resurrect Mobile Bay Bridge Project

Fairhope, Alabama 

 

ESMPO January 2021 meeting.

LETTER TO BE SENT TO GOVERNOR

During its meeting this morning, the Eastern Shore Metropolitan Planning Commission policy board unanimously passed a resolution "authorizing (its) chairman (councilman Jack Burrell) to work with the Mobile MPO's chairman  (mayor Stimpson) to craft a letter to the governor ... asking her to work with ALDOT ... to push forward a solution to the Mobile Bay bridge situation."

A year and a half ago, Governor Ivey declared the project "dead" after a previous design was removed from consideration by the ESMPO over high tolls being proposed by the state to finance the project.

Chairman Jack Burrell said the proposed letter would be non-binding at this point:  "If we don't work with the governor's office ... and ALDOT ... not going to start ... to move the ball forward on this."

 

TOLLS STILL THE ISSUE

Dr. Lou Campomenosi, whose Common Sense political organization helped defeat the state's earlier bridge proposal, called to process so far a learning experience for everyone involved: "My sense here is .. its a do-over for everyone ... we learned things ... you all too ... but has Montgomery learned anything?  If no-toll, no-bridge is still their operating assumption ... I suggest they have not learned a thing."

Campomenosi left the door open a crack to compromise however, by mentioning a new plan just submitted by a group led by retired local economist Dr. Don Epley that would impose much lower "user fees"on the bridge itself, and leave a free alternative for locals.

He also mentioned a no-toll plan proposed by state senator Albritton last year.

(Fairhope's mayor Sullivan and councilman Burrell are members of the policy board. Burrell was elected chairman at the beginning of this meeting.)

 

Dr. Campomenosi addressing Policy Board.

 

 

 

 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Nothing wrong with a toll as long as there is a free way too.
Anonymous said…
I'd like to know whatever happened to all the money and effort for the adaptive signal light system from a while back. Because the signals on 98 along the eastern shore are most assuredly not implementing this system. Just go watch the light cycles at Morphy and at Nichols. The traffic flow across 98 at those intersections will be empty, and the signal just stays green for no one. It's ridiculous.
https://mynbc15.com/news/local/new-adaptive-signal-system-to-ease-traffic-congestion-on-us-98-eastern-shore
Publisher said…
The adaptive signal project has been fully implemented. Increased wait times for side streets was always predicted.
Anonymous said…
" Increased wait times for side streets was always predicted."

That's not the issue. Waiting for a green on 98, while no cross traffic is present, is the issue. The adaptive technology has not solved the problem of 98 being a stop-and-go crawl.

Anonymous said…
Agree with comment 1. One of these (hurricane) days it could be handy having an alternate route.
Publisher said…
Try using the form at the bottom of this report to file complaints with aldot about the adaptive signals.

http://thefairhopetimes.blogspot.com/2019/04/us-98-synchronized-signals-still-not.html
Anonymous said…
Needs to be a tunnel.
Anonymous said…
I live in Fairhope and I have to say I've seen the adaptive signal work. I will say that those times were not in rush hour traffic, but I have found that if you turn off of Fairhope Ave. heading north (and vice versa), and go 50 mph instead of the 45 speed limit, it works pretty well. There were two times in the last 6 months or so, I have driven from the Publix intersection in Daphne to Fairhope Ave. with all green. As for sitting with a red light going E-W, I have too, but you don't sit that long, no more that 2 minutes or so.
Anonymous said…
toll tunnel.
Anonymous said…
A tunnel would b much better.