City Opposes Senator's Jurisdiction Pullback Bill

Fairhope, Alabama

 

Senate Bill 107
Fairhope's police jurisdiction

 SENATE BILL 107

A bill sponsored by Fairhope Senator Chris Elliot to limit municipal policing and planning jurisdictions beyond city limits (see at bottom) is being opposed by the city's leadership, as well as the Alabama League of Municipalities.

In a recent WPMI TV interview, Elliot defended his bill; questioned why those living outside city limits should pay city taxes:

The bill's sponsor, Senator Chris Elliott, says this year's version keeps the municipal sales tax rate in effect to continue funding public safety.

"I have constituents that look at me and say, 'Why am I paying a city tax if I’m not in the city?' You have to wonder why that is. What we've done is we've left some of the funding there to allow for the continued exercise of law enforcement," said Elliot.

(Funding for police and fire protection outside city limits are often cited as reasons for the taxes.)


CITY LEADERS' OPPOSITION

When asked about it by the Times, council president Burrell said he found it "odd" that city leadership was never consulted by Elliot before filing the bill:

"No, I do not support this bill.  Neither does Mayor Sullivan.  In fact, the Alabama League of Municipalities representing over 400 towns and cities throughout Alabama, is opposed to this bill.  I find it odd that our own Senator would introduce such legislation without consulting the leaders of the very city he is from.  I will actively oppose this bill."

 

Below is the excerpt from the ALM’s newsletter, The State House Advocate, published yesterday, February 12th.

 

Police & Planning Jurisdictions – SB107 by Senator Elliott, as introduced, eliminated municipal planning jurisdictions. Additionally, it placed a moratorium on police jurisdictions and removed all building code enforcement authority. The bill was amended and phases out police and planning jurisdictions. It accomplishes this through freezing the police jurisdictions after the 2020 Census and immediately restricting planning jurisdictions to one and a half miles for those municipalities exercising police jurisdiction authority and to the corporate limits for those municipalities who do not exercise police jurisdiction authority. SB107 as amended passed the Senate this week and now heads to the House County and Municipal Government Committee. ALM is opposed to SB107. Contact members of the House committee, here, and respectfully voice your opposition.


The bill has passed the Senate and is currently under consideration in the  House.

 

SYNOPSIS OF BILL

Senate Bill 107 as introduced: (1) prohibits municipalities from further extending their police jurisdictions; (2) limits the territorial jurisdiction of a municipal planning commission to the land located within the corporate limit of the municipality; (3) provides that a municipality may not regulate the construction of buildings within the police jurisdiction of the municipality; (4) provides that no business license tax or other municipal fees may be levied in the police jurisdiction of municipalities; and (5) provides that any taxes and fees levied in the police jurisdiction shall be audited for compliance to ensure they were expended in the police jurisdiction.

These changes would: (1) increase the obligations of counties to regulate the construction of subdivisions where municipalities previously provided the service by an undetermined amount, while simultaneously resulting in a decrease in the fiscal and administrative obligations of the municipality; (2) increase the fiscal and administrative obligations of municipalities by an undetermined amount to provide an audit report to the Department of Examiners of Public Accounts; and (3) decrease revenues of any non-compliant municipality that fails to remedy the noncompliance within 12 months by an undetermined amount dependent upon the amount of licenses and taxes those municipalities collect in their police jurisdictions and how long it would take them to provide an audit proving them to be in compliance. 

As amended and reported by the Committee on Governmental Affairs, limits the territorial jurisdiction of a municipal planning commission to certain lands in the police jurisdiction of the municipality.

 

Senator Elliot

Comments

Anonymous said…
Sneaky Chris at work. Remember the school tax vote?
Anonymous said…
I don't agree with Elliot on most things but this bill is a good idea. A city should have no say so in what happens outside their city limits. Yes if they provide police and fire service they should be able to collect a fee or tax for that. Burrell's statement about not being consulted just displays the arrogance of some city officials. Think of it this way, it would be like me dictating that all my neighbors must paint their walls a certain color.
Anonymous said…
Police and fire protection should have been pulled back to city limits long ago. The freeloaders outside can annex in if they want it!
Anonymous said…
there is a reason for cities to be involved for planning purposes.
Anonymous said…
Things are bad enough with the free for all developments outside city limits already. This makes it worse. The senator has gone out of his way to aid unrestrained development in Fairhope. The city should only consider annexation of properties already adjacent to the city limits.
Anonymous said…
The city building/planning dept should have no jurisdiction over landowners outside of city limits. The policy we have now does nothing to stop growth or county subdivisions. It is only creates confusion and complications. The town council and planning commission need to have jurisdiction ONLY over the land and buildings within the city limits. Police and fire are less of an issue if the fees and taxes collected are audited.
Anonymous said…
This is a no brainer. All City services stop at city limits.
Anonymous said…
Senator Pitman used to have a lot of town hall meetings to keep the public informed about whet he was doing. This guy has not had any to my knowlege.
Anonymous said…
Of course the municipalities oppose it. THEY are the problem. They are collecting taxes from people who do not get to vote. If a City chooses to extend its police jurisdiction, it needs to make sure it has the funding to do so. The fact that Cities have been allowed to choose who they tax outside the City is unconstitutional.
Anonymous said…
Cities don’t simply choose whom to tax outside their city limits. The property owners have to agree. Cities do not collect taxes outside city limits. They charge for utilities, police and sanitation.
Anonymous said…
It is called the City Limit for a reason.
Anonymous said…
Well as for the businesses just out side the city of Fairhope we do pay taxes and fees with in our business licenses.Yet FPD is notorious for no show,it's a civil issue,and mostly stays in parking lots.As for Chris as my rep,there is no representation,19 calls and emails,no response.Actually got a response form a rep in Mobile,but not mine.