Apartments Proposed For North Highway 181

Fairhope, Alabama 

 



CALLED ROCKWELL PLACE

During its August meeting, Rockwell Place, a proposed 206-unit apartment complex for the east side of Hwy 181 just north of Hwy 104, was tabled until a future meeting by the city’s planning commission because it did not completely meet criteria in city subdivision regulations (waivers were requested instead). There was also a discrepancy in the paperwork concerning ownership, according to staff.

Although outside of city limits in un-zoned county planning district 14, the 36 acre property is still within the city’s extra territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) where city subdivision regulation requirements still apply.

Planning Department staff recommended denial of the multiple occupancy project plan (FST owner; leased to Corte Land Trust) for lack of connectivity to adjacent properties and for using private streets.

Sawgrass Engineering’s consultant for the project told commissioners it is be similar to the existing Old Battles Place south of town, and that a revised plan is in the works with connections to the south and east; he still argued similar private streets are allowed elsewhere in the county.

City planning director Simmons said just a change of the design of interior streets may be needed for compliance.

The project’s engineer requested their proposal be tabled until a future meeting; city staff suggested a PUD may be more appropriate.

Sewage service for this development is to be provided by the private the BCCS; electric by Riviera, and water by Fairhope utilities.

 

 

Comments

Anonymous said…
Is BCCS building a needed sewer plant for this project ?
Publisher said…
BCSS already has a sewage treatment plan near Summerdale.
Anonymous said…
Wonder what the gratuities are on this one?
Anonymous said…
pool and clubhouse.
Anonymous said…
The city of Fairhope should not have any say in this development. It is outside the city limits. The city should only be able to make decisions on property that lies within the city limits. PERIOD!
Anonymous said…
Sounds like someone lives just outside city limits. If BC would not allow the Wild West in development then I could live with that. However there is little oversight from them so I prefer Fairhope to call the shots. It is bad enough that the city is almost blackmailed on developments which could go either way. BC needs to be more responsible in its zoning.
Anonymous said…
Time for another building moratorium.
Anonymous said…
This "relationship" between Baldwin County and City of Fairhope confuses me. Can someone clarify who is responsible for infrastructure (sewer, power, roads, etc.), schools, roads, etc. when in the "dual" zone? Will the new police/ambulance limitations outside city limits have an effect?
Does the City of Fairhope have a financial benefit from development in the "dual" zone?
Anonymous said…
Electric power outside city limits is either Riviera or Baldwin EMC cooperative. Sewer either by city or Baldwin County Sewer Service; costs for sewer infrastructure are borne by the developer. Water and natural gas is city since there are no other competitors here. New streets outside city limits are built by the developer but the county's responsibility to maintain.

Businesses outside city limits still pay a city sales tax but at 1/2 rate, 1 cent. Fairhope provides police protection three miles outside. The Volunteer Fire Department is a private oraganiztion that provides service outside city limits per their various jurisdiction agreements with other fire depts.; but it is primarily supported from city taxes, around $1 million per year.

A new state law that took effect Jan. 1st will gradually reduce city's planning/building permit responsibilities outside city limits ... and increase the county's, all to be negotiated with cities within 2 years ... As I understand it ....