Speeding Control Devices Installed On Gayfer Avenue

Fairhope, Alabama 

 Updated

 


New Gayfer Avenue speeding signs.

 

CITIZENS COMPLAINING

Solar powered "driver feedback" signs have been installed on Gayfer Avenue to control chronic speeding problems between Greeno Road and Section Street.

The city's Street and Traffic Control committee voted to install the signs during its last meeting in October after residents had requested a stop sign at Blue Island Avenue to slow traffic; stop signs are not considered appropriate for major collector roads like Gayfer.

Two similar signs were installed on north and south Section Street earlier this year; another was just installed on Fairhope Avenue near Fairwood Boulevard.

The devices also record data like speed and traffic count.


October traffic committee meeting.


Comments

Anonymous said…
They need to give out tickets to.
Anonymous said…
Does anyone really think these “warning” signs will work?
Direct the money spent on the signs towards traffic patrols or the dreaded speed humps. What happened to common sense?
Anonymous said…
Works better when it’s a Cop writing tickets
Anonymous said…
I do not see how these recent signs will solve the problem of speeding down or up Gayfer. People are just flying right by these blinking signs. Do we not have enough policemen to patrol areas and write tickets? It is becoming dangerous to drive the streets in Fairhope. People are also going right through the stop signs and not stopping.
Anonymous said…
We need a lot more CITIZENS COMPLAINING
Anonymous said…
Publisher: I am guessing the Traffic Committee meetings are open to the public? Do they allow a comment period? Is there anyway you could provide us with a heads up? I don’t believe the City advertises the meetings.
Publisher said…
Yes. Street and Traffic Committee meetings are open to the public; they are not regularly scheduled though, just "as needed." Most upcoming meetings are posted on the first page of the city's website, or you may ask the city clerk to send you notices.
Anonymous said…
The Traffic Committee met two times this year (January and October I think). I have attended in the past but they appear to have their minds made up (NO stop signs or speed humps) regardless of what the citizens think. I've basically begged the Police department to give out tickets in our neighborhood but have seen nothing done. I would be glad to participate in any group that wants to attend a future Traffic meeting ...if we can get a room full, maybe they will be forced to pay attention.
Anonymous said…
This committee is one of the ones that has stopped following state law regarding open meetings. Sunlight is still the best disinfectant.
Anonymous said…
I just went down Gayfer tonight.
They have the sidewalk and gutter in.
I do not see how a car could fit into a right turn lane? Seems too narrow.
Anonymous said…
Publisher:
I have a question. Recently I have been traveling down Gayfer at Greeno and observed the eastbound “right lane widening.”
I could be mistaken, I thought the project would provide a dedicated right turn lane eastbound Gayfer on to Greeno.
The contractors poured a new sidewalk (who will be using that?) and water gutter. My last trip on EB Gayfer to Greeno, the “right lane” didn’t seem wide enough for a golf cart to pass through.
Are they going to re-stripe Gayfer, creating a narrower west bound lane? I am confused.
Publisher said…
No "right turn only" lanes, just left turn ones ... from Gayfer onto Greeno. See this report from last summer and the accompanying diagram at the bottom http://thefairhopetimes.blogspot.com/2022/07/gayfer-avenue-turning-lane-construction.html
Anonymous said…
Publisher:
Thank you. Tell you what, I just went by again today and I do not even see how a dedicated “left” lane would work. We will sure hope for the best!
Publisher said…
The design calls for the north side of the road to be widened too. Will take another three or four weeks probably to complete.
Anonymous said…
Publisher:
I just drove by and observed that they are indeed widening the lane of the north side of Gayfer at Greeno. I noted that they took about 4’ of the front yard of the home on Gayfer/Greeno. Guessing that was an imminent domain issue? Tearing the house down?
Publisher said…
Yes, the state would have had to reimburse the owner for the right of way. We understand original owner of the house passed away recently. Expect that to be re-zoned for commercial use sometime soon ... .