Another Zoning Battle Ends Tuesday

Fairhope, Alabama 

 Update: The referendum passed with 428 in favor and 302 opposed.


February 7th zoning referendum.


Proposed district 39.

 

BARNWELL/RIVER PARK AREA

Signs for and against land use zoning dot the area of proposed new zoning district 39, roughly east and north of US highway 98 -- and west of Fish River in the county before Tuesday's referendum at the Barnwell Volunteer Fire Department (8597 US HWY 98).

Much of the area once fell within Fairhope's extra-territorial planning jurisdiction, but that is no longer the case due to new state laws enacted about two years ago ... and other recent successful referendums south and east of city limits.

Arguments on social media and in a series of community meetings follow a familiar pattern, those in favor want some say in how their neighborhoods develop ... and opponents want to be able to do whatever they choose with their private property. 

River Park community resident  Frank Leatherbury said at one recent meting "zoning is not going to stop growth ... but gives us a voice in the changes over time."
 
County planning department manager Mathew Brown said if the referendum does not succeed, it will be two years before another may be held. Several new housing development proposals have already been approved or are on the drawing board for the area (Southbend, Sherwood, etc); adoption of zoning could limit density of any new similar proposals, units per acre.
 
Brown said the county officially remains neutral while residents decide, but referred to a question and answer page about zoning facts available online (click).
 
If it passes, there will be an immediate freeze on any new development proposals until a five person committee of citizens from the area develops a new zoning map, and it is approved by the county commission.

A referendum in nearby district 38 failed by 50 votes last December; another for district 14 across Fish River is being planned now.
 
Judging by the number of signs, the proponents seem to have the edge this time, but that has been proven not to be a reliable predictor of election outcomes. 





 

 

 

 

 

 




Comments

Anonymous said…
Vote "NO".
Anonymous said…
DR Horton, 68Vntures and other developers want you to vote no!
Anonymous said…
You have that wrong!DR Horton and the other builders would love for you to for yes.!
Anonymous said…
Why wouldnt people want some say in how our communities grow and develop? Seems like a no brainer to me.
Anonymous said…
Look at the areas that are already zoned. They look like paradise. If you are going to set residential lot size, why don't they limit it to a three acre minimum?
Anonymous said…
I hate to see all the development but I cannot in good conscience vote yes and force the farmers and other land owners to be stuck with agricultural property that they will have to sell cheap. Doesn’t seem right.
Anonymous said…
It is always a bad idea to use government force to satisfy the needs of the mob. The mob is not a person rather it is an irrational group where nothing can be understood besides their own opinions. The individual owners rights matter more than a group, no matter how they feel about the growth. They have no moral right to tell them what landowners are allowed to do. It is nothing more than a veiled threat to use government force. There are subdivision regulations for a reason. They should default to more individual freedom of the actual landowners to do as they wish with their property. It does not belong to the community, that’s socialism.
Anonymous said…
The bottom line is vote "NO" today!
Anonymous said…
Stop paving over paradise for profit and vote yes today to save our community!
Anonymous said…
Well? I know it takes a long time to count three votes? Local news coverage is great!
Publisher said…
We posted the results last night above. The referendum passed.
Anonymous said…
The multitude are easily led......what a disappointment.