Another Historic Fairhope Home Lost

Fairhope, Alabama 

 



 

350 N. BAYVIEW

Another old house in the Bayfront Historic District built in 1919 was demolished recently; this one was a Shadow Lawn model,  Aladin Company kit-house, in the bungalow/craftsman style of the time.

From online references: "One of the longest lived and most successful kit home companies was the Aladdin Company, based in Bay City, Michigan.

Started by brothers William and Otto Sovereign in 1906, the company remained solvent and family-owned until it shut its doors for the last time in 1981.

Over its more than seventy years in business, Aladdin sold more than 75,000 homes. Customers included individuals and corporate clients in both domestic and international markets. Whole neighborhoods and even a town — Hopewell, Virginia — were developed for company employees. In a fold-out flyer sent with the 1925 catalog, the company listed by name and city more than 1000 builders of Aladdin homes as well as government and corporate customers including the State of Michigan, the president of Liberia, Dow Chemical Co., Pittsburgh Plate Glass Co. and Standard Oil.

Advertised as "Readi-cut" and "Built in a Day," Aladdin and other kit home manufacturers revolutionized home buying and building for the middle class. From tiny workingman's cottages to the thrifty investor, Aladdin homes provided a solid value and easy construction."

Current owner of the property is Robert Writt of Houston TX.  It was the Helen and Robert Blosser residence for many years before.

 

2015 historic district survey.

 

Kit house .


Comments

Anonymous said…
Yep! Sat and watched it being taken down. Sad. Always loved that house. It was recently used for filming a movie (Jesus Revolution????, not sure).
Anonymous said…
Sad .
Anonymous said…
bulldozin' the town!
Anonymous said…
We all need to start talking to the city council about some way to slow this down. You can’t stop it but you can slow it down with Historic Preservation. Gives people time to realize the historic perspective of the home and how it helps in creating a neighborhood.
Anonymous said…
Well it's a free market society. I was disappointed it was never even listed. I know there were people interested in buying and living in the house (as is) or with modest updates. It was a very solid home. Now it has been raised and they are petitioning to subdivide the lot. Change is hard sometimes....
Unknown said…
Fairhope letting the rich twats do as they please
Anonymous said…
Well many factors fall into this.Lack of lots,rehab is a nightmare especially with Fairhope,and their over bearing insight.Most today don't like the vintage build but love to paint it all white without any extra space.Makes the town look like a plantation not a community.
Anonymous said…
I loved that house.
Anonymous said…
Yes the last comment is very true. The building Departmemt requires so much when renovating. If they determine it’s a level 3
Then the costs become so much owners decide to tear down instead of repairing. Unfortunate that we are losing these very sound been thru 25 hurricanes and still standing but the rules make owners replace so much it’s better to tear down
Anonymous said…
Not sure this kit house met the criteria as historic, other than being old. If a group wants to preserve an old house then pool your money and buy it.

HOW IS A PROPERTY DETERMINED ELIGIBLE FOR THE NATIONAL REGISTER?

In order to be considered eligible for inclusion in the National Register, a property must first be shown to be significant under one or more of the National Register Criteria for Evaluation.The Criteria for Evaluation are:

Criterion A: Association with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of our history.
Criterion B: Association with the lives of persons significant in our past.
Criterion C: Properties that embody the characteristics of a type, period, or method of construction; represent the work of a master; possess high artistic value; or represent a significant whole whose parts may lack individual distinction.
Criterion D: Properties that have yielded or may yield important information about prehistory or history.
Anonymous said…
The single Tax Corporation wants to bulldoze the town because they could charge more rent on the new McMansions.
Anonymous said…
Towns can set their own criteria and preservation process based on unique community history, needs, and values. Also the town process can support historic preservation in a way that respects owner rights. The only reason to comply with the National Register is for federal tax credits and grants. There are many examples around town of owners updating some aspects of their property while preserving historic facades. These homes are not in compliance with the national register, but they do preserve the history in a way that makes sense for modern use.
---And agreed the town should ask the building department to ease renovation requirements when it comes to historic properties.
Unknown said…

Fairhope has to get a local Historical Commission. There is no preservation for anything. The building torn down on Fairhope Ave. was the first black hospital in Fairhope...gone! This house might have been a kit house but it was historic to Fairhope and the owners apparently did not give anyone a chance to preserve it.
Anonymous said…
Yes Please. Fairhope Needs a Historic Commission. The Single Tax Colony also needs to step up. To the FSTC members who care about the history, please note:
According to the Bluebook (p.276), "Let it be emphasized that throughout the history of Fairhope, members could have compelled the executive council to place restrictions on the type or quality of improvements to be made on colony lands."