Upcoming Zoning Referendum Explained In Siverhill

Fairhope, Alabama 

 

Director Matthew Brown

 

Organizer Marla Barnes.

 

 DISTRICT 14 REFERENDUM APPROACHING

County Planning director Mathew Brown and organizer Marla Barnes explained the technicalities of the upcoming zoning referendum and answered questions from a standing-room-only audience in the Little Bohemian Hall in Silverhill this afternoon.

Barnes said she is a 28 year resident of the Marlow community and actually voted against zoning the last time it came up 12 years ago -- but has become more "educated" about it now.

She described the currently-unzoned district as a "target for developers" today.

Brown said he was only a guest at the meeting, had no role in organizing it, and  described the process as entirely citizen driven: registered voters in the district petitioned the county commission for the referendum.

He said zoning used to be a"city thing" -- but new types of rural zoning have become popular recently, such as base community zoning where everything stays basically the same as now, unless major changes are proposed by property owners.

Brown: "This is not municipal zoning."

If approved on June 6 there will be an immediate 180 day moratorium on all new development applications (except smaller residential types) -- until a five person committee of citizens selected from the district meets to develop the new zoning map.

Then the county commission will then vote to enact it, Brown said.

District 14 runs generally down the east side of Fish River from Silverhill to just south of Marlow.

(Brown said a minor discrepancy discovered involving one lot in the proposed district will be corrected before June 6th.)

Comments

Anonymous said…
Yes immediate 180 day moratorium on all new development applications (except smaller residential types) . Why not includes all small residential types too ?
Anonymous said…
This is a joke. The county wants zoning, so they can give certain people preferential treatment. It is a bunch of male bovine manure. Vote NO!
Anonymous said…
Developers want you to vote no so they can have their way. Vote yes!
Anonymous said…
The multitude are easily led. Isn't that right Mr. Brown?


Anonymous said…
Mathew Brown is a good man. A strait shooter.
Anonymous said…
going to be wall to wall houses someday either way.
KH said…
It’s understandable that people are afraid of property ‘control’ and the simplest answer seems like it would be to vote NO. However, we as homeowners CURRENTLY HAVE NO SAY in what happens to properties near us. Developers are taking advantage of this lack of ‘control’ by putting high density single family homes wherever they want, regardless of a lack of infrastructure to support it (roads, services, etc.). This can lead to overcrowded roads and higher property taxes. We need the legal right to challenge this. WE WANT TO HAVE A SAY in what happens to our community. VOTE YES.