Fairhope Council Considers Gasoline Tax

Fairhope, Alabama 

 

Fairhope Walmart.

FOR ROAD MAINTENANCE/CONSTRUCTION ONLY

The city council debated the pros and cons of enacting a gasoline tax, to go for road maintenance and construction.

Treasurer Creech said Fairhope is currently the only city is the county without one, except for Perdido which has no gas station. Baldwin County has the tax too.

Road paving cost this year is over $900K and will be $1.5 million next year, which comes from impact fees and other sources now. Those impact fees could go to sidewalks, drainage and other pressing needs.

A 2-cent per gallon tax, restricted to road projects only under a new Alabama law, could generate about $400K here, she estimated. 

(Daphne, Silverhill, and Spanish Fort current charge one cent; Foley and Loxley 3 cents.)

COUNCIL UNDECIDED

Most council members expressed neutrality at this point except for Martin who said he favored the tax, to make much needed road improvements around town.  He also mentioned the long-standing need for a new road at the airport to facilitate long-stalled sale/development of west side property: the city still subsidizes the 2007 purchase of that land for the airport authority ($300K per year debt service).

Councilman Boone said he could argue for or against; Robinson said he saw the need for more revenue for road projects, but remained unsure. 

Conyers and Burrell were non-committal as well.

Robinson asked the rhetorical question: "Could we just charge it ... on out of towners?"

Creech was directed to gather more data about the potential revenue for a upcoming meeting.


County gas taxes.

Enabling law.


Comments

Anonymous said…
We dont have a gas tax?
Anonymous said…
Sale taxes hurt the working poor and middle class. The rich only blink at it. Try adding to property taxes or income tax.
Anonymous said…
Sales tax lets out of towners help pay our bill for us. Another no brainer.
Anonymous said…
just about every street in town needs paving. how did we get so far behind?
Anonymous said…
Sales tax would be the only fair way for revenue as everyone using the roads pay.

However, developers should cover costs of infrastructure impacted by subdivision construction, including roads.

The sales tax cut of 1 cent is a drop in the bucket to each consumer. The funds should have been Re-directed to local streets and roads.
Anonymous said…
Rough road in Fairhope
E. B. said…
We need to remove all of the references to “single-tax” around town. It’s pretty much an “every-tax” colony now.
Anonymous said…
How do owners and operators of electric vehicles pay their fair share of gas taxes? And their vehicles weight a lot more than gas vehicles that damage roads.
Anonymous said…
To hit nonresidents, if you raise the tax lower either the property tax or the vehicle registration fee.
Anonymous said…
Moved to Fairhope years ago for small town on bay. Purchased an existing home. Watched farms turned into match box subdv, large apartments, traffic, police cameras added, utility concerns, school tax approved beyond norm and now gas tax for roads. To be frank we will be leaving as Fairhope has become what we moved away from.
Anonymous said…
bye bye!!
Anonymous said…
People move here then complain about people….wait for it….moving here.
Anonymous said…
If we're going down this regressive road, which I hope we do not, for every two pennies raised in fuel tax, give back one penny in property tax. That is the way to collect more from visitors than locals.

Better, though, is to dramatically increase impact fees on new development. Doing so will slow our runaway growth and help our infrastructure accommodate the inevitable growth to come.

Additionally, we should be aggressively taxing all overnight stays (hotels, VRBO, etc.), before we ask locals for more.

Finally, and this is not an idea that often occurs to government officials, where can we cut fat from the budget? Until we are running as lean as can be, don't ask us for more money. Taxes never go away; the multiply and compound. Let's not California Fairhope.
Anonymous said…
Maybe we could divert the money going to the airport termminal. $2 million for those who can afford planes.
Anonymous said…
Everyone is from one state, place or another. As years go by you see poor leadership ruin what was once very nice. Rude comments to one you disagree with show how low the state of our society is. And were this growing city is headed. Complaining about people moving here is not accurate. It is the management of how it is being done that is the complaint. But if you like rush hour, water rules and increasing crime goodluck.
Anonymous said…
Huh?
Anonymous said…
i like the idea of lowering property tax
Anonymous said…
The owners of electric golf carts pay an additional $250 for their annual tag registration. IDK about electric cars/trucks, but I presume it's something similar
Anonymous said…
These are not really taxes. User fees.
Anonymous said…
Don't raise the vehicle registration fee. I know people who were going to purchase new cars/trucks until they found out out much the annual registration fee would be. Instead, they purchased used vehicles.