Downtown Speed Limits To Be Lowered?

Fairhope, Alabama 

  Update: This is to be be discussed at the October 23 city council meeting work session.

Lower speed limits coming?


October Street/Traffic meeting

 

SAFETY CONCERNS

The city's Street and Traffic Control committee passed a resolution to lower speed limits in the highly-congested downtown area to 15 mph, to enhance pedestrian/traffic safety. 

Police chief Hollinghead said enforcement may be problematic there, but voted for the resolution; she suggested the new electronic driver-feedback signs could be used for a boundary.

Public Works director Johnson suggested markings on the pavement itself be used in some places too, to prevent excessive signage.

Mayor Sullivan called it "not a bad idea" -- and voted in favor as well.

Planning director Simmons was to come up with a list of specific streets where it will apply, if the city council decides to enact a new ordinance at an upcoming meeting.

Comments

Anonymous said…
good idea. 15 really means 25 in the real world.
Anonymous said…
On the contrary, in my experience 25 really means 15. Fairhope Avenue and Section Street crawl with rubbernecking tourists (glad to have them and their sales tax revenue) in cars and locals in golf carts giving tours to their out-of-town friends and families. So, nothing will really change.
Anonymous said…
there is no way to get peple to slow down here excpt for speed bumps
Anonymous said…
👍
Anonymous said…
If police are not doing anything now about speeders then why do they think lowering the speed limit would do any good??
Anonymous said…
You can make the limit 5MPH but it will be ignored since there is no enforcement by the police department. It would be very interesting to get monthly stats on speeding tickets issued in the downtown area. I agree speed bumps are the best alternative until the police actually start deterring people by issuing tickets.
Anonymous said…
they say they can't put in speed bumps because marchers would trip over them in parades
Anonymous said…
Does this go for residential streets too? Twenty-five (25) is entirely too fast on these small streets.
Anonymous said…
Reduced speed limits will give us all an excuse to slow down and enjoy the drive.
Anonymous said…
I agree with the above that traffic laws are only good as enforcement. If Chief Hollingshead has concerns, it must be a problem.
Save the money on the electronic signs, a complete waste of time.
With hundreds more residents and visitors coming soon, hoping the City has a traffic management/parking plan
Anonymous said…
They can enforce it if they choose to enforce it. They enforce school zones on 98 and other laws. Majority of people speeding are residents of Fairhope and surrounding areas. You issue a bunch of citations, then words out - don’t speed in Fairhope. The police chief states “enforcement may be problematic there” and mayor says “not a bad idea.” How about, “we will make the safety of our citizens a priority and enforce it” and “that’s a great idea! Let’s do it”.
Anonymous said…
A few may complain about it but the vast majority of drivers here want to be allowed to drive fast and are unwilling to give it up.
Anonymous said…
Police here are short handed and do not have enough officers to enforce traffic laws.
Anonymous said…
they ought to be raising the speed limits. people are busy these days.
Anonymous said…
How about enforcing the 25 MPH rule for golf carts? They are not supposed to be on 35 zones, yet they are all the time, particularly North Section while people are try to get to school or work in the morning. Oh, and while your at it, bust the underage drivers in golf carts.
Anonymous said…
Actually Low Speed Vehicle carts can be driven on any streets with up to 35MPH posted speed limit signs.
Anonymous said…
If the police department is short handed as someone said - please explain why you see 2 police vehicles pulled off the road in parking lots etc. opposite each other with windows down talking to each other??? This happens in various areas around Fairhope and has been going on for a few years. If short handed this visiting with each other would not be going on. It continues to happen.
Off the Beat said…
Two police cars talking to each other has been "going on" for far more than a few years and in every municipality in the country.

Did it ever occur to you that our LEOs need to communicate with each other, by mean other than radio, so that they can exchange information and ideas to better serve and protect citizens--even those who have no idea what a job in law enforcement entails?
Anonymous said…
With the technology we have today with the click of a button - do not think there is a problem communicating. I am sue they get all this on their computers, iPads & phones! They are visiting with each other rather than patrolling & enforcing traffic rules & laws.
Anonymous said…
Let me paint a picture for you. "Radio" represents all electronic communication, and officers often need to speak in person for reasons that are clearly unimaginable to you as you drive by at 40 m.p.h., reading their lips.

I am always astounded by the positive correlation between the volume of complainers and their ignorance.
Anonymous said…
Whoa!! Somebody hit a nerve. Sometimes the truth is maddening and it has nothing to do with ignorance!!!!
Anonymous said…
Four exclamation points? Yes indeed, the louder the volume, the greater the ignorance...and, it seems, the emotional dysregulation.
Anonymous said…
What is emotional dysregulation? Please explain to us that do not have a PHD in English.