'Working Waterfront' Plan In Jeopardy

Fairhope, Alabama 

 

 

Waterfront area.

Latest waterfront design.

 

TOO COSTLY?

Mayor Sullivan said late last week the fate of the controversial waterfront/greenspace revitalization plan funded by a $6.2 million BP RESTORE ACT grant is uncertain after only one contractor submitted a bid last week, and that was way over what was expected. (Another city source said the lone bid was almost $8 million.)

There were no responses at all when the project was advertised previously; the multi-faceted complexity of the project is to blame, according to public works director Johnson.

Sullivan said the city council will have to decide what to do next: reduce the scope/value engineer to cut costs, ask the BP Recovery council for more money, make up the difference ourselves, or cancel the project entirely and return the $6.2 million to the federal Treasury are some alternatives.

If the money is returned, the city would have to absorb the $500K already spend on engineering.

Another alternative, the city could ask the RESTORE council for an extension, to give more time to figure out how to proceed since the grant money was to be spent by the end of next year, according to the mayor.

In its latest form, the project was to rebuild/replace aging seawalls, enhance parking, add a restroom under bluff and walking trails as well a new stairs and disabled access from the bluff above (among other components).

ALABAMA RECOVERY COUNCIL TO MEET NEXT WEEK

Coincidentally, the Alabama Gulf Coast Recovery Council is set to meet November 1st, 10AM at Five Rivers Park on the causeway for a scheduled public input meeting on other matters.

Sullivan, who as mayor is a member of the AGCRC, said she did not know yet if would be appropriate to bring up the city's new working waterfront issues on such short notice.

Other members are mayors of Mobile, Gulf Shores, Orange Beach, Bayou la Batre,  Dauphin Island -- and chairmen of the Baldwin and Mobile County Commissions.




Comments

Anonymous said…
Scale it back ! way back & forget only be a problem lift
Anonymous said…
Make up the dif. Still a good deal overall.
Anonymous said…
Lets be reasonable. Eliminate the lift project. Engage a dredge to build a beach on the south side of the pier. Leave the fountain alone. The funds available will more than adequate to complete the other projects.
Anonymous said…
Proceed but only with the items that are necessities for the long term
Anonymous said…
b a shame to give up $6 million peeps
Anonymous said…
The next big storm is just going to wash the whole pier away anyway.
Coastal Compass said…
Rework the Project


Focus on the Seawalls and only do the rest if it is required by the Feds.

Can someone enlighten me on the "enhanced parking lot"?
Anonymous said…
The lift is ridiculous. There is plenty of parking below and very few people walk to and from the Pier and downtown. Also, there is beach area on the North side and is fairly tacky from above. Please don't tacky up the South side area that is so bucolic now. Shore up the sea wall and update the existing bathrooms.
Anonymous said…
Put in a ramp instead of lift. Add more parking please.
Anonymous said…
If the city goes forward with the preposterous lift plan, it will forever after be called the "Bungle on the Bay" and forever be associated with this city council and this mayor.

Let's make sure that they install a brass plaque with their names on it.