City's New Growth Plan Finally Coming Up For Approval

Fairhope, Alabama 

 

Proposed new plan.

 
September 2021 kickoff meeting.

THE "BLUEPRINT FOR FUTURE GROWTH"

After being worked on for three years, the city's proposed, new comprehensive growth plan should come up for approval during the next planning commission meeting, according to planning director Simmons; the city council got a preview during a recent work session.

A consulting team led by Neel Schaffer/GMC Engineers met numerous times with a "steering committee" appointed by the mayor -- and held 13 neighborhood/community meetings around town getting citizens' input.

Planning Commission chairman Lee Turner said recently he has not seen the entire report yet, but the commission could accept it, or make changes before approving it.

Since it is funded by a federal grant, time is running short to decide, he said.

COUNCIL NOT SATISFIED?

Several council members have privately expressed some disappointment in the results so far; mayor Sullivan declined comment when asked by the Times recently.

(At least one of the plan's recommendations has already been enacted though: requiring annexation of new developments to get city water utility service -- for contiguous property only though).

NOT BINDING

One frustration we sometimes hear from citizens is that comprehensive growth plans in Alabama are legally non-binding, only general suggestions that need not be strictly followed by future planning commissions/city councils; changing that would require action by the state legislature. 

(Comprehensive plans are legally binding in Florida, for example.)


Neighborhood meeting.


Comments

Anonymous said…
Another Village plan with no teeth
Anonymous said…
Then why don't we ask our local delegation to get the state legislature to make it mandatory not just voluntary? Bring some order to the chaos.
Anonymous said…
It is true that these “comprehensive” plans have no teeth. They are done because of Federal requirements in order to get Federal money. Most plans have public input and usually identify infrastructure improvements to roads, schools, hospitals, utilities, etc. Seems logical.
Unfortunately, Politics and money get in the way.
Anonymous said…
Sprawl Plan
Anonymous said…
One of the problems I see in Fairhope is the Rule is there are no Rules because there are ways to get around the rules
Anonymous said…
Chamber of Commerce people want as much growth as possible because it is good for business.