Changes Coming To Pt. Clear Planning District?

Fairhope, Alabama 

 

District 26.

 

COUNTY PLANNING DISTRICT 26

The Baldwin County Commission is considering making changes to the zoning ordinance for Planning District 26 in the Point Clear area south of Fairhope, to allow PRD's (Planned Residential Developments) where currently they are prohibited. When zoning was adopted there by residents in 1993, they decided not to allow them at that time.

District 26 generally lies along the water, south of CR 32 and west of CR 3 -- to just south of Mullet Point.

This was one of numerous zoning ordinance changes considered (and adopted) at the March 18 Baldwin County Commission meeting, but this one was delayed at the request of commissioner Underwood; she said she thought some current residents of the district were not aware of the proposed change.

PRD's allow for more flexible zoning than those already-assigned on zoning maps.

(The Colony at the Grand development is one example of a Planned Development, although it is in the city of Fairhope's jurisdiction and called a PUD.)

 



Changes proposed.

 

Comments

Anonymous said…
If landowners want to keep their property values up.....continue to not allow such developments.
Anonymous said…
Who is asking for the change? RSA?
Anonymous said…
Yikes. Something big coming?
Anonymous said…
Doesn’t this have to be approved by the residents of the district? Do they not have a say? Or can the Commission just change what they want when they want?
Publisher said…
No. Contact your county commissioners.
Anonymous said…
Chamber of commerce wants faster growth. Realtors too.
Common Sence said…
More sprawl for you all
Anonymous said…
Getting pretty sneaky around here again these days.
Anonymous said…
Agree with all the above. Just like the City of Fairhope, there should be a pause with the County until everything catches up. Let’s all write Matt McKenzie.
Anonymous said…
A heads up, if you e-mail your Commissioner the characters are limited. You can also call.
Anonymous said…
Nothing wrong with PRDs. Help to fight sprawl.Same ole same ole for miles ....
Anonymous said…
PRD's are a big contributor to sprawl of cookie cutter small lot neighborhoods that do not have to abide by lot size rules
Anonymous said…
Even the PRD residents/merchants have to drive on the roads, go to hospitals, children in schools.
What is wrong with cornfields, cotton fields, peanuts, or pecans? We still have to eat, wear clothes.
Anonymous said…
PRDs are anti-sprawl. allow something diffferent and creative.
Anonymous said…
The only people that want “new” are the developers that buy all of this property and probably don’t live here. They don’t care how it affects residents as long as they get their ROI. If they get turned down, they move on to the next opportunity. Why doesn’t the city make them spend the money to revitalize something that already exists. Pretty soon small town Fairhope will be gone. Just another tourist trap.
Anonymous said…
Again this is not the city's problem it is Baldwin County's
Anonymous said…
Well, it is obviously a problem for the people that live in Fairhope. This is the Fairhope Times.