Modified Hwy 104 Rezoning Proposal Returns

Fairhope, Alabama 

 Update: This rezoning was subsequently approved by the Baldwin County Commission.


Hwy 104 @ St. Michael Way

 

Newest rezoning proposal.

 

NO COMMERCIAL COMPONENT THIS TIME

During its March 6 meeting, the Baldwin County Planning Commission approved a text amendment to the planning district 37 zoning ordinance to change 31.1 acres on the corner of Hwy 181 and Saint Michael Way from BCZ to RSF2. A previous rezoning request by the property owner (Robert Randall)  that included B-2 commercial along the highway was withdrawn during the last county commission meeting before a final vote was taken, as requested by the owner's representative.

Several neighborhood citizens spoke during the latest planning commission meeting on March 6; none opposed the residential-only zoning.

The rezoning is scheduled to be considered again by the Baldwin County Commission during its March 18 meeting.


From the February 28, Fairhope Times report: 

"A rezoning request that was tabled from an earlier Baldwin County Commission meeting after encountering stiff resistance from neighbors was withdrawn by the property owner before a final vote was to be taken during the February 18 county commission meeting at the Fairhope courthouse.

Chason and Chason P.C. on behalf of property owner Robert Randall was asking to rezone 32 acres in planning district 37 at the northeast corner of the intersection of Hwy 104 and Saint Michaels Way from BCZ base community zoning, to RSF-2 single family housing -- and B-2, neighborhood business along the highway.

Numerous residents of the nearby Verandas neighborhood opposed on grounds of traffic, density, commercial incompatibility, and general quality of life issues. 

The commission voted unanimously to accept the withdrawal request; the property owner may submit a new application at some point in the future."

Comments

Anonymous said…
RSF-2 seems appropriate for the area
Anonymous said…
may need to put a traffci ight there to
Anonymous said…
I don’t see where any type of zoning would alleviate congestion on 104 and surrounding roads. For those in Fairhope that accumulate a lot of “treasures” how about a boat/RV storage locker yard?
Anonymous said…
Dunkin donts
Anonymous said…
Put on hold until Lawrence Road is open clear to County Road 48
Anonymous said…
Are there plans to open Lawrence Road between 104 and county road 48?
Publisher said…
Yes. This is a Eastern Shore MPO project.
Anonymous said…
Opening Lawrence Road would require an extensive and expensive bridge to be built over the Pensacola Branch wetland that empties into Fish River. The cost to do this would be substantially more than simply completing the 4 lane on 181 from 104 to 48 (Fairhope Ave.)
Publisher said…
Yes a bridge will be needed there. This is a county road; Hwy 181 is state's responsibility.
Anonymous said…
Is there an estimated time for the Lawrence road project to be started and completed?
Publisher said…
No. It currently lacks funding too, last we heard.
Anonymous said…
Traffic is going to get worse.....there is no way Baldwin county is doing enough for the growth in that area. All roads lead to Wal-Mart.....with the mess on Langford rd...and the east end of Hwy 48.
Anonymous said…
It'll probably cost 20 million dollars to build a road and a bridge across the Pensacola Branch wetlands. It would be cheaper to 4 lane Langford Road.
Anonymous said…
End Jan. cold snap had utility company begging folks conserve. Parts were melting was term used. Yet lets keep adding more. Smart growth we are told as our costs increase to off set the upgrades. Election is near.
Anonymous said…
Again this is Baldwin County not in city of Fairhope. Why can't people understand it?
Anonymous said…
It appears that no one understands politics. They can say whatever they want to.....but in reality they all want growth and more property taxes.
Anonymous said…
Baldwin County is who sent the warning. https://gulfcoastmedia.com/stories/baldwin-utility-companies-urging-energy-conservation-as-snow-usage-burden-systems,248600#//
Anonymous said…
Good chance the development would be annexed by the City once completed. Regardless, still impacts to schools, hospitals, restaurants, roads, etc.



Anonymous said…
No. Cannot "be annexed" by city unless owner wants to. Schools are Baldwin County's not city. Roads there too -- county and state's. "Restaurants" are private property of course. Why are people so misinformed?
Anonymous said…
Chamber of Commerces, Realtors Associations, etc pull the strings around here. All want faster growth. the more the better ...
Anonymous said…
And still not one Dunkin Donuts.
Anonymous said…
Taxed utility as reported by Baldwin County is not misinformed. It is dangerous to continue to add.
Anonymous said…
Sure. Folks who moved herre in last 5 or 10 years want to shut door behind them. Not gonna happen.
Anonymous said…
Folks moved here 5-10 shut door? Large assumption. Majority area wants better control on growth, evidenced Fairhope board placed development pause for several months. So it happened.
Anonymous said…
The latest of numerous such previous pauses ... just before elections. Never helps.