More Parking Needed Downtown

Fairhope, Alabama thefairhopetimes.blogspot.com 

 

Current city garage.

Preliminary data.

PARKING STUDY ALMOST COMPLETE

Planning Director Hunter Simmons said preliminary results of a parking study by Walker Consultants shows up to 700 more spaces may be needed in the downtown area within the next ten years, to keep up with the current pace of growth.

The consultant was hired last March to help the city develop a strategy for more parking -- and how to pay for it.

Final results of the study will be presented to the public later (two months?) for more discussion, Simmons said.

A second parking garage or even "adding on" to the current one are some options mentioned previously.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Anonymous said…
no kidding!
Anonymous said…
I could have told you that for free! The college is taking up a lot of downtown parking. Can the post office relocate and free up valuable part space?
Anonymous said…
It is hard to imagine another 1,400 or so visitors daily to the little buildings downtown. It will be crazy. I suspect it will drive Fairhope residents away and become a Mecca for only tourists.
Anonymous said…
Maybe the next group will be finally able to address parking and traffic issues.
Anonymous said…
Instead of more pickle ball and tennis courts, they need to focus more on parking.
Anonymous said…
It would be a wonderful idea to use existing areas currently available for public parking — soccer fields, stadium, Fly Creek park and invest in a trolley service to shuttle visitors to downtown destinations hourly.
I would think if the City has the money to invest our tax dollars in unnecessary properties such as strip of property for the clock; they could invest in a trolley shuttle.
I also hope that we will elect leaders this time that can think and execute some ideas to make these needed changes. The current band of brothers SITTING on the Council knew this was an issue for over a decade. The light coming out of the tunnel is a freight train, pivot!
Anonymous said…
Past time to wake up & smell the thirty year old parking problem
Anonymous said…
Shuttles might be a step in the right direction but why not step further and look at fixed route bus service along the 98/Greeno corridor. We are looking at gridlock in a few years and should try and get more cars off the road. Downtown has parking problems, the hospital will soon and more to come.
Anonymous said…
Flatten the old K1 school on church street and make parking lot. Problem solved!
Anonymous said…
As long as parking on city streets is free no one will use a trolly or parking garages. There are lots of small towns that have modern metered parking that use wireless credit cards. Very easy to use. I can guarantee you that a lot of people will use the parking garage instead of paying to park. Do not waste your time on trolly’s. The city should at least investigate how the modern parking meters work.
Anonymous said…
Nobody will use buses, and they will only serve to impede traffic and provide moving blights. Keep the ugly city things in the ugly cities. We live here for a reason.
Anonymous said…
“Moving Blights”? Well, it’s either add lanes to Greeno/Section/Fairhope Ave. (wait for it) or figure out some way to move folks more efficiently. We’re looking at an “ugly city” soon for folks that get out much.
Anonymous said…
The K1 site makes sense. They've done a great job of building the Nature Center but the rest of the site is an eyesore and is unused.
Anonymous said…
Pay to shop and dine, and then pay taxes on what we buy and eat? Be forced to play with phones and apps when I simply wish to exit my vehicle and enter the stream of commerce? Look at scores of ugly "How to Pay" signs up and down both sides of every street? If you wish to create parking by keeping people away, then by all means charge people to park on the streets that they already paid for with taxes. I stopped visiting the stores and restaurants that I like on Palifox in Pensacola for this very reason. I'd rather give the money to charity than be voluntarily fleeced by the government.
Anonymous said…
Agreed. Very few will use buses and trolleys, unless there's a special event. It'll be a failed experiment, like our back-in diagonal parking (which WAS a good idea). And an expensive failure.
Anonymous said…
Other than for special event parking, there are are normally plenty of parking spaces available around town. People are just too lazy to walk from S. Summit or Bancroft or the Church parking lots. There is no way to guarantee bountiful parking on Fairhope Avenue or Section Street, but go one block east or west and there are many places from which to choose. The City should be able to lease special event parking from the shopping centers and use shuttles for those events.
Anonymous said…
Huh?
Anonymous said…
Well the city and the Mayor seems to more interested in new parks and projects that bring in visitors yet where do they park?They spent millions buying the K-1 center and still and haven't used it now new windows.Even the post office is blocked during large events and we can't even get mail during that time.With space limited and height restrictions this is an issue.Streets two narrow now.Where does it go?