New 'Peoples Boarding House' Decision Delayed

Fairhope, Alabama thefairhopetimes.blogspot.com 

 

 

December 2025 planning commission.

 

West side view.

FORMER FAIRHOPE HARDWARE SITE 

After a lengthy discussion the city's planning commission voted to table consideration (site plan and MOP approval) of a new 5-unit multi-use building at 301 Fairhope Avenue until its January meeting. A 26 room boarding house for upper two floors is being proposed by owner SILDI Llc. -- as well as a restaurant, and possibly a medical clinic, retail store, or professional offices on the first floor. A rooftop terrace/bar is to be used by boarding house guests as well.

Architect Ryan Baker (WAV Llc.) and other applicant representatives present agreed to the delay to allow for more time to overcome objections raised by the city planning staff.

PLANNING STAFF WANTED DENIAL

The city's planning department recommended denial due to a conflict with required loading zone and gas meter, impact of the scale of the project to the surrounding neighborhood, and concern with increase in traffic caused by the intensity of use, according to the documentation provided.

When asked by a commissioner where the boarding house guests would park lead planner Mike Jeffries replied "they would have to find space around town."

Another commissioner worried about loose furniture/equipment possibly being blown off the fourth floor rooftop terrace.

Commissioner Eric Cortinas' concerns included details like height, storage space, fire escapes, and loading zone access.

CONFORMS TO ZONING ORDINANCE?

Representatives for the applicant (Baker, Larry Smith of SE Civil) contended the plan meets all current zoning ordinances as well as the city's comprehensive plan -- but agreed to the delay to work out concerns.

Owners' attorney Brad Hicks of the Stone Crosby Law firm added it all is being done "by right" under the existing zoning ordinance. 

CHAIRMAN WEIGHS IN

Planning commission chairman Lee Turner observed it would "be one of the three most intensely used buildings downtown" if approved; and "calling it a boarding house" (vs hotel) was just "an end-around to avoid the usual parking requirements" -- but added he still liked the project overall.

Still, aspects "scare" him Turner said like the prospect of "having 26 guests parking on Fairhope Avenue," as is routinely being done now along Section Street by some Hampton Inn guests.  He thought the city may have to finally address that problem in some way.

He agreed many specific details still needed to be worked out before taking a vote -- like infrastructure, and dumpster location.

SUPPORT FROM NEIGHBORS

Other neighborhood building owners John Bethea and Rodney Pilot spoke in favor of the project -- as well as several area business owners.

Fairhope historic commission chairman Mara Kovelsky asked that a plaque be installed on the new building commemorating the sites history as well; owners agreed.

 


Comments

Anonymous said…
Isn't a 'boarding house' for transients that have no ability to pay deposits for apartments? Seems an odd business in the middle of downtown.
Anonymous said…
no not in this case, it is exactly the same as a hotel.
Anonymous said…
Upscale hotels do not allow residents to cook in their rooms. This sounds fairly lowbrow for a hotel.
Anonymous said…
noboby said cooking in rooms allowed here either
Anonymous said…
The parking solution for 26 or more "boarding house" guest vehicles is: "they would have to find space around town." Ridiculous!!
Anonymous said…
The original article introducing this project pointed out that one of the primary differences between a boarding house and a hotel is the ability of boarders to cook in their rooms.
Anonymous said…
many hotel rooms have kitchenetes too these days
Anonymous said…
Looks good to me. Hotel, boarding house, inn whatever .....
Anonymous said…
People talk out both sides of mouth. They talk against it, but are for it. Follow the money.
Anonymous said…
YMCA comes to mind
Anonymous said…
Why can’t the boutique hotel guests also ‘find space around town’? This switch makes no logical sense to me.
Fairhope Hoping said…
Publisher: Do you know if the parking structure behind the hotel is routinely full to capacity? I would hope the Planning Commission would want to know.
Anonymous said…
Seems like the “Fairhope Planning Staff” is the real issue and it appears they’re grasping at straws to find any reason to deny this project (e.g. gas meter location, etc.). That is getting so old. If the project meets the City guidelines just approve it. City Council listen up. The majority of people in Fairhope are in favor of this project and they will vote you back in if you start approving structures that benefit the community like this one. Don’t be scared of the few vocal opponents.
Anonymous said…
I'm not certain that it remains full but I do know that the parking spaces do not appear adequate for most larger vehicles, which is why anyone driving anything larger than a small sedan/compact car avoids it.
Fairhope Hoping said…
I’m guessing those spaces are probably as wide as the ones at Walmart. The real problem is people don’t want to walk a little bit to a shop. They need to be forced to park there. Solve it by increasing the disability spaces ( which are needed) in front of businesses on Fairhope/Section and steer those more mobile into the parking structure. Long time coming. Parking will get worse.








Anonymous said…
Most people I know are not in favor of the boarding house but are unhappy that the original boutique hotel plan was denied. If the hotel was turned down due to parking concerns, approving this 'boarding house' is nonsensical because, while most hotel guests travel in one car, roommates could share a boarding house room and each have a vehicle to park.
Anonymous said…
This is simply a legal tactic by their lawyers to avoid the city's parking requirements. It will still be a boutique hotel in reality. Ought to be denied.
Anonymous said…
Whenever our weak-kneed city leaders muster enough courage to do 2 hour timed parking downtown all parking problems will be solved immediately!
Anonymous said…
If people vote for this boarding house. stupidity and ignorance is at the highest.
Anonymous said…
It seems more likely that the ones that are opposing it are actually the stupid and ignorant ones! Fairhope needs somewhere nice for people to stay downtown other than the Hampton Inn that isn't very nice.
Anonymous said…
I frequently drive up and around the parking deck in downtown Fairhope just to see if the parking issues are really as bad as they state. The very top floor is almost always completely empty, and the other floor is usually only half full if that. The bottom level usually has a few spaces open as well. People are too lazy to walk over & take the elevator down to the main floor if they do drive up. Everyone wants to only park in front of the store they wish to visit. There is no reason that the new boutique boarding house guests would not be able to park there as it is never ever full.
Anonymous said…
Some body should make them put turning lanes on that intersection because it needs thm now.
Anonymous said…
Transplant I presume.