Homeless Now At Childrens' Park

Fairhope, Alabama


Community Park

USUAL LIBRARY SPOT CLOSED OFF

While their usual places at the library are being remodeled, at least one of Fairhope's homeless is hanging out now at the Community Park near the splash pad.

"Missy" (aka Wanda Hudson, notable for her foot-long fingernails) has been a fixture on a library bench for several years; numerous private offers to provide shelter have been rejected according to police and other reports.

A police spokesman once told the Times she remains there because the people of Fairhope are so generous, bring her food, clothing, and even money.

Her supporters claim she is harmless and should be left alone; others worry she may be mentally ill and could do harm some day: They think a better place should be found for her.

There are at least two other homeless in town by our count, who live in their vehicles.


CITY COUNCIL SPLIT

Two city councilmen privately agree something should be done  to address the homeless problem here -- ie. new laws?); but at least one other wants her left alone too.

She is violating no laws while living on city property, he says.

(The city council rarely acts unless all are in agreement, a somewhat unusual arrangement that makes it hard to get things done -- since majority votes are all that's needed for most governments elsewhere.)






Comments

Anonymous said…
Miss Hudson is quite litigious also. Years ago, she apparently lived in her storage unit on DIP and sued the company for $10 million when the unit was somehow locked with her in it. The Judge awarded her $100,000, but it was her own fault and she should not have received a dime. She had allegedly been deemed a risk to herself and others. I find it absurd that she is allowed to live in a children's park but our City Council does not worry about lawsuits that they cause. Please vote YES for City Manager. This is not a good situation for anyone in Fairhope. There are places for her to go, even perhaps the rehab place across the street? I wish her no harm but she does not belong in the park here. Any Council Member who wants to leave her there should personally indemnify the city for any damages from lawsuits resulting from her residency.
Anonymous said…
Leave her alone. She is so sweet!
Anthony said…
Contrary to the article’s quoted assertion that Ms. Hudson “is violating no laws while living on city property,” I would direct Fairhope’s elected officials and public servants to the Code of Alabama Title 13-A, Chapter 11, Article 1 (§ 13A-11-9), which does define and identify loitering as a “violation.”

I would further direct them to Fairhope’s Code of Ordinances, at Chapter 14, Article (§ 14-1(b)), which incorporates that state law, by reference: “Any person or corporation committing an offense within the corporate limits of the City of Fairhope, Alabama, or within the police jurisdiction thereof, which is declared by a law or laws of the State of Alabama, now existing or hereafter enacted to be a violation, shall be guilty of an offense against the City of Fairhope, Alabama.”
Moreover, Chapter 20, Article II of our local code extensively regulates vehicle parking. Thus, if our community—through its elected representatives—decides that overnight parking is undesirable, for example, our laws can be amended to reflect that public will.

Whatever one’s opinion of Ms. Hudson and the nameless others, leadership requires honest acknowledgment of the facts. Opinions may differ as to the public health and safety, as well as economic, effects of our homeless policies, and we must also consider the effects of our policy on the homeless, themselves, whether those policies skew toward censure or indulgence. Regardless, we must not avoid hard decisions through obfuscation and confusion.

The people of Fairhope are a generous people, but they must be informedly guided by reason rather than misinformation and/or emotion.
Anonymous said…
The city council has a secret pact requiring five votes to pass legislation?

No wonder nothing gets done around here!!
Anonymous said…
Anthony... excellent comment. Common sense, not emotions, should prevail here.
Anonymous said…
thank you mr. spock.
Anonymous said…
Wanda has rejected all offers of shelter by many of us here in Fairhope and Daphne. She is mentally Ill and embracing the victim role and has a tremendous desires for attention. We created this situation by enabling her to remain on public property, me included. We brought her food, clothing, money and several of us found her several long term living options that she absolutely refused. She will not leave on her own and she is not stable. She can be super sweet to us when we are bringing her items but we have seen the ugly side and worry. Having been up close and personal with her we need to stop enabling her squatting lifestyle on our public places. We are setting a bad precedent for future issues.
The town has the duty to remove her immediately for loitering.
We are still working on better assistance for those in need but we can't help those that refuse help.
Anonymous said…
Let her stay at the K-1 it is vacant.
Anonymous said…
thats true about her suing the mini storage owner, as well as suing a hospital in the state of Texas when she had a baby born with no brain and the hospital fought for a year to remove it from life support. she is actually used as a good example OF WHAT not TO DO AS A MINI STORAGE UNIT BU THE INDUSTRY. she needs help. i have no doubt if it were a homeless man camping at the library or the children s park they would find them a home in the city jail get her help and get her off the streets.
Anonymous said…
I did not see her this morning at the Park; was she relocated elsewhere within the city? Even though I don't agree that she should be allowed to live at the library or the park, I do like to be aware of where she is so that I can steer clear; as the last poster mentioned, she is not stable and she is not always calm.
Anonymous said…
I read the Texas article and don't believe that this is the same Wanda Hudson; the ages don't appear to fit (although I could be wrong).
Publisher said…
The picture was taken Monday; we do not know where she is today. We know of no Texas connection to this person.
Anonymous said…
Well regardless of posts and opinions,Antony 's post is spot on.....however and law enforcement in Baldwin Co or any city in Baldwin Co is by payout gratuitous.....at this posting the current DA has several cases he refuses to bring to the grand jury for prosecution.The county sheriff is worthless, and the court system is blind to actual rule of law.All said ....the current state of Baldwin Co is disturbing, and having a discussion with the current city council is like having a debate with blogger Paul Ripp....lots of noise and hot air but absolutely NO SUSTENANCE or resulting action....just noise.
Anonymous said…
So if drive to Mobile bus station and drop off 4 homeless men at that park the city could not do a thing
Anonymous said…
I actually thought about the same thing.......I have seen homeless people with pets at interstate exits in Nashville and would love to bring them here to a great place. I love that the City Council and police are on board with protecting them. Nashville has loitering laws which prohibit the homeless from living in our parks......Fairhope is awesome!
Anonymous said…
She never needs Haloween costumes.