More Calls For Enhanced Traffic Safety

Fairhope, Alabama


Proposed new LED crosswalk

CITIZEN INJURED RECENTLY

After hearing from another citizen about traffic safety concerns, the city council authorized spending up to $29K for design of new safety enhancements in the downtown area.
MacKellar addressing council

Hollie MacKellar told the council she had been hit and seriously injured by a car in early November and six children (two of her own) narrowly escaped injury as well.

MacKellar: "Its important for you all make it safe out there for our children ... to ride bikes ...  cross streets ... for everyone to b able to walk and not get hit."

MacKellar had to be life-flighted out after the accident but is doing better now.

She told the Times later the driver who was speeding and under the influence of "something" was arrested.


LIGHTED CROSSWALK PROPOSED FOR SECTION STREET

One of the proposals is a new pedestrian crosswalk across Section Street at the Police Station, using in-pavement LED lights.

Other improvements along Section Street are "bulb-out" planters at De La Mare Street and cobbled center lane safety strips from Fairhope Avenue south to Johnson Street; pedestrian crossing signals are planned at the Fairhope Avenue intersection as well.

Unspecified "traffic calming" measures are planned for Fairhope Avenue at the post office and appropriate wayfinding signage installed throughout; all improvements will be ADA compliant.


NEW POLICE CHIEF'S IDEAS

Interim Police Chief Hollinghead says she has some new ideas too, including adding more traffic patrols, but is waiting to see if she is made permanent chief by the council before beginning to implement them.



cobbled center lane

bulb out planters










Comments

Anonymous said…
They should set up down town like Gatlinburg Tn. Crosswalks in specific areas like at corners (I know we have them now) and crosswalks in the center sections in the middle of a block. One catch if you dont use the crosswalk then you should be given a ticket. Just like the bicycle people that do not abide by the laws of the road.
Anonymous said…
I agree with the above-poster. Also, crosswalks should be painted over where there are traffic lights because pedestrians (I am told) have the right-of-way anyplace where crosswalks are painted in. This leads to most of the problems here because, regardless of the status of the traffic light, people meander through the walkway which backs up traffic through another light change.
It would be wonderful if the FH police could find officers to post on Fels, White, etc sometimes. No one stops at lights ever and the speeding is dangerous. I hope that the
Mayor warns those driving city trucks that they should stop at crosswalks when pedestrians are crossing; I was almost hit with my dog a few months ago crossing Fels when a COF truck almost killed us. He didn't even slow down.
Anonymous said…
Get the police on the streets and write tickets.
Anonymous said…
There's a crosswalk where Oak crosses Section and no one ever even slows down when someone is wanting to cross Section. That should be painted over for sure.
Anonymous said…
Paint over crosswalks to enhance ped safety? What a dumb idea. Glad you are not in charge!
Anonymous said…
Paint over crosswalks where traffic lights monitor movement; ENFORCE the law against those who do not stop for pedestrian traffic within painted crosswalks where there are not traffic lights. Sorry I was not clear in my earlier post. It may take a few weeks of keeping police within the city but if they stay on it, drivers will get the message. Interestingly, most of the speeders around town are residents because I see the same cars flying around daily. I would love to blame tourists but they are normally too concentrated on finding their destinations that they don't appear to cause problems.
Anonymous said…
The police jurisdiction is way too big. That is why there are not enough traffic officers.
Anonymous said…
You can have the best paint,lights and signs. Add into the already busy area the new Mayor backed Entertainment District. Then you will see drivers speeding after drinking - city authorized.And No amount of officers will stop the fatality and damage that are sure to come.The first lawsuit sure to be a result of this stupidity is the City Of Fairhope. Who will pay for increased enforcement, damage repair,litter,increased crime and the list could go on. So let us simple taxpayers pay the bill so a dozen alcohol pushing city leaders can profit how?
Anonymous said…
What about diagonal crosswalks?

Their supposed to be more safe.
Anonymous said…
There is very little speeding in downtown Fairhope. It is hard to speed on a golf cart when you are 90.
What there is downtown is a lack of understanding of basic traffic rules (i.e. red means stop and green means go) and distracted driving by Fairhope Barbie & Ken on their phones. Let's not make this problem more complicated than it is.
Anonymous said…
Someone gets hit and killed by a speeder.
Someone gets hit and killed by a distracted driver.
Someone gets hit and killed by a color blind person.
Lots of people driving carts under 90.
Lots of people driving with dogs in their laps.
The problem is attitude, its all about me, I'm special, its the new Fhope mindset.
Anonymous said…
Speed "humps" or speed "tables" accomplish more in my opinion then well marked crossing areas. Trust me, when you are speeding and hit a speed "hump/table" you remember that! Put speed "humps/tables" downtown on Section Street, Fairhope Avenue, Oak Street, Magnolia Avenue, Fels Avenue and all the cut through streets. One is especially needed at the curve on South Mobile Street right before the Pier Street Boat Launch. That's a blind curve there and cars scream down that street. I strongly suggest putting speed "humps/tables" down ASAP and you will see the traffic slow down. Please don't waste a ton of city money on a "traffic study" when there are solutions already available.
Anonymous said…
Well said!
Pam Ewell said…
I live across the street from where Holly McKellar was hit on Nelson Drive. The current speed limit on a short portion of the road, less than 1/4 mile, is 35 but many people exceed the limit including city vehicles. The limit needs to be dropped to 25 because children ride bikes and people walk that portion of the road, no sidewalks. The limit on S Mobile St and Heard Rd, are 25, but the 1/4 mile portion of Nelson Dr connecting the 2 is 35, why?
Anonymous said…
Why not eliminate cars? All my life I have been taught that the streets belong to cars, don't jay walk and wait until the street is clear before crossing even with a traffic light. This is apparently not the case in Fairhope. Driver, watch for pedestrians everywhere and bicyclist that set their own rules of the road. There are crosswalks all over Fairhope, some are marked with signs and others are not. An example the crossing on Fairhope near Hwy 181. It is marked but no sign and I have never seen a driver stop for someone waiting to cross. Eliminate parking and driving through downtown Fairhope and place parking lots outside of downtown. Condemn property if necessary, it is for the good of the community Everyone can walk in to shop and eat and all pedestrians will be safe plus the roads can serve as giant sidewalks. Place signs at all crosswalks stating the law don't leave it to the imagination of either the driver or the pedestrian.
Anonymous said…
To the person who commented about the police jurisdiction being too big, I hear ya but that is short sighted. The Sheriff's dept cannot cover that area adequately but the PD does keep drunk drivers, drugged drivers/ drugs and other criminals from getting to our city limits. Yes, these things still happen in the city but without police presence in the jurisdiction they would certainly become more frequent.
Anonymous said…
Sheriff Dept. needs to hire more deputys then so Fairhope police can concentrate on us.
Anonymous said…
Th black of enforcement is not a total issue but the comment by the Acting Chief ?Interim Police Chief Hollinghead says she has some new ideas too, including adding more traffic patrols, but is waiting to see if she is made permanent chief by the council before beginning to implement them.
Now lets not set the Press effect here, but the largest issue it the reduced lane size of streets, absolutely NO AVAILABLE parking.This restricts PD to limited patrols as we'll as capability to enforce..Lets reintroduce a WALKING patrol to enforce the two hour parking rule.Set a system of deliveries of large trucks to certain times if possible, or tort some type of delivery system to accommodate the stores and vendors down town.Issue warning or citations to landscapers who refuse to use orange cones to ask for a short work parkas they consistently block areas, sometimes with attitudes.A few more stop signs in areas such as Mershon street, at Johnson and Belangy,as well as Brown and Johnson.Full light with trips at Ingleside and Fairhope Ave.Right turn only at Way greens exit north.Enforce the construction contractors and subcontracts to use PROPER SIGNAGE with regard to life and safety.
Publisher said…
Interim Police Chief Hollinghead told the Times recently she is waiting to implement any significant changes because if she is not made permanent chief after the six month probation period imposed by the city council ... whoever is may not agree with them; they would have to be undone again.
Anonymous said…
I know the answer, let us give anybody who would like an adult drink. Free to walk around, and then another. So they can get in there car and drive home. This is our Mayor idea of safe traffic control in our new entertainment district.
Anonymous said…
The walking patrol sounds like a good idea. I would encourage Chief Hollinghead to implement changes she thinks worthwhile. If changes are good the new Chief would likely keep them. Failure to do anything sounds like playing it safe and a lack of ideas. It sounds to me that too many people ignore the traffic laws. There needs to be some attitude adjustment. A foot patrol might be very helpful if the entertainment district is established. Firm police presence could keep the troublemakers in line.
Anonymous said…
Pedestrians need to be more considerate too. My husband just about ran over two walking their dogs at the curve of Ingleside & Fairhope Avenue. Crossing at the curve, dark outside and they had on dark clothing with no reflective lighting.
Anonymous said…
I also like the idea of foot patrols especially in the early evening. I recommend one or two undercover (not in uniform) officers floating around. The problem people will decide they better do their bad behaving somewhere else. Right now there are at least a few drunks and others who never get even a ticket. Once they have been identified they,ll be hesitant to keep acting up here
Anonymous said…
As for walking patrols they should be UNIFORMED not plain clothes or undercover.The actual uniformed presence is a deterrent in itself.If a walking patrol is used it should be with in all hours in regard of 8 am - 9 pm with a dual shift.
Anonymous said…
It's fantastic that you are getting ideas from this article as well as from our dialogue made here.